Quantcast

What's the point of having steel vs. aluminum in BMX cranks?

Dog Welder

Turbo Monkey
Sep 7, 2001
1,123
0
Pasadena, CA
I've noticed that a number of BMX crank companies produce steal and aluminum versions of their cranks...for example Demolition and Primo to name two companies. Only thing is that these aluminum bmx cranks weigh just as much as a set of steel cranks. Whats the logic behind manufacturing a aluminum crank as heavy as a steel? Do they "ride" different?
 

scurban

Turbo Monkey
Jul 11, 2004
1,052
0
SC
I don't think so, I've ridden both, and I think Steel is better. I don't understand why the make two models that weigh the same. Some race companies make them in Aluminum and they are a lot lighter. Then its understandable, but in the same weight, I just don't get it either.
 

dromond

Monkey
Aug 20, 2002
286
0
Northampton, MA
It's my understanding that the primo powerbites (solid aluminum) or a bit heavier and much more resistant to abrasion (read: grinding) than the also very popular profile race cranks (tubular steel.)
 

S3C

Chimp
Jul 19, 2004
30
0
Edmonton, AB
- One is cheaper then the other
- Maybe some people prefer Alum over Steel for their own reasons
- Alum doesn't rust, steel does
- Steel is generally stronger
 

pnj

Turbo Monkey till the fat lady sings
Aug 14, 2002
4,696
40
seattle
some people have problems with the splines on profile type cranks. some people have problems with chromoly cranks. more choices = more happy people.

but I think the real reason is, Primo was able to create a product that kids could use easily and not spend alot of dough doing it. aluminum grinds slower then steel so I don't think that has anything to do w/ it.

personaly, chromo is the only way to go on my bmx bike.
 

dromond

Monkey
Aug 20, 2002
286
0
Northampton, MA
pnj said:
some people have problems with the splines on profile type cranks. some people have problems with chromoly cranks. more choices = more happy people.

but I think the real reason is, Primo was able to create a product that kids could use easily and not spend alot of dough doing it. aluminum grinds slower then steel so I don't think that has anything to do w/ it.

personaly, chromo is the only way to go on my bmx bike.
The point is not that the cranks or for grinding on but that they're less likely to get a hole punched in them by a concrete ledge if you botch a grind :nope:
 

pnj

Turbo Monkey till the fat lady sings
Aug 14, 2002
4,696
40
seattle
I've NEVER seen a hole punched in 4130 from missing a grind. in fact, in 20 plus years of riding a bmx bike, I've NEVER seen a hole punched in 4130 period.

seen plenty of broken, snapped, ripped 4130 though. :D
 

RandomV

Monkey
Feb 20, 2003
195
0
Indiana
Well, the Primo Powerbite cranks are basically copies of the old GT cranks that no one would buy years ago. They're stiffer than steel, and in my experience they have been bomb-proof.

My biggest problem with steel cranks are the lack of pinchbolts on the crank arms. I like those. And I hate the "Profile wobble."

As far as the Profile SS cranks, those were kind of a bad idea. The bearings end up being too small, causing easy failure... And they really weren't as durable as you would have probably expected, either.
 

pnj

Turbo Monkey till the fat lady sings
Aug 14, 2002
4,696
40
seattle
I never had a problem with profiles wobbling. even my heavier friends never had that problem. I have seen profiles bend though. and break, and everything else minus having a hole punched in them.
 

mcA896

Turbo Monkey
Aug 15, 2003
1,160
0
Cape Cod, MA
RandomV said:
Well, the Primo Powerbite cranks are basically copies of the old GT cranks that no one would buy years ago. They're stiffer than steel, and in my experience they have been bomb-proof.

My biggest problem with steel cranks are the lack of pinchbolts on the crank arms. I like those. And I hate the "Profile wobble."

As far as the Profile SS cranks, those were kind of a bad idea. The bearings end up being too small, causing easy failure... And they really weren't as durable as you would have probably expected, either.
if your biggest problem with steel cranks is the lack of pinch bolts, take a look in the danscomp catalog/website crank section. theres a sufficient number of pinch-bolt steel cranks in there. azonic 454's are my peronal fav
 

RandomV

Monkey
Feb 20, 2003
195
0
Indiana
mcA896 said:
if your biggest problem with steel cranks is the lack of pinch bolts, take a look in the danscomp catalog/website crank section. theres a sufficient number of pinch-bolt steel cranks in there. azonic 454's are my peronal fav
Well, it's probably not my biggest problem. It's just the one that I think of first.
I've seen six (or is it seven?) sets of Profile cranks fail in the same time that I've been running the same Primo Powerbites, so I'm pretty set in that department.

As far as the Profile wobble, it's usually only a problem for people that don't take care of their bikes. If you just check every once in a while to keep 'em tight, you're usually okay.

Lastly, I'm thinking about trying out the new Primo Hollowbites. They're powerbites, but the arms are hollow.
 

Weaver

Monkey
Oct 27, 2003
217
0
austin, TX
aluminum cranks can be stiffer... especially if they are beefed up.... like saints versus profiles... saints are much stiffer but practically the same weight...

XTs are very stiff, and much lighter than profiles.... this is coming from a guy that has never ridden anything but profiles... and is switching to XTs....
 

bmxr

Monkey
Jan 29, 2004
195
0
Marietta, GA
RandomV said:
As far as the Profile wobble, it's usually only a problem for people that don't take care of their bikes.
Exactamundo! Profiles (or any 4130 crank with a 48 spline interface and no pinch bolts) kick ass as far as I'm concerned. Never had a problem and been using them since the 80's. I would never buy a tapered bb interface product (like some of the al arm cranksets). It is a piece of crap design as far as any heavy duty application is concerned. The old octalink XT's were worthless as hell, but I haven't tried the new ones. They look nice...
 

pnj

Turbo Monkey till the fat lady sings
Aug 14, 2002
4,696
40
seattle
HTFR said:
whats this about alu not grinding as ealy as steel? i don't belive you.

in theory, aluminum should grind slower due to the fact that it's a softer metal then steel. to test this theory, get some aluminum pegs and go hop on an aluminum handrail. let us know how it works for you.
 

bikenweed

Turbo Monkey
Oct 21, 2004
2,432
0
Los Osos
I've ridden BMX for almost ten years now, and I might have an answer for ya. Primo has always made all of their parts in Taiwan. Years ago, Taiwan was not capable of producing high quality, tubular 3 piece cranks, so Primo decided to simply beef up a pair of generic aluminum, SQUARE TAPER BB cranks. With extensive marketing, the cranks sold fairly well. I've had quite a few friends ride Primo cranks, and almost all have had problems with them. Problems ranged from threads stripping, pinch bolts not functioning properly, BB's coming loose, arms breaking... the list goes on. Unfortunatly, Primo marketed these cranks very well, so a lot of riders bought into the idea of aluminum cranks that weigh a ton.
Profiles, while not perfect, weigh a little less, and are much less problematic. In fact, I've been riding a pair since 1996, with few problems. And they are "race" cranks, too. The aluminum vs. chromoly debate is pretty much over now. With companies like Truvativ and RaceFace manufacturing ISIS drive cranks meant for abuse, the longevity is about equal to Profiles. However, they weigh less, are easier to work on, but cost substantially more. I still run Profiles today, and will until they break. (EVERYTHNG will break eventually) Taiwan has really learned a lot, and now produces tubular 3 piece chromoly cranks with the best of them. Now the only determining factor is really weight and price.