Eff da po-lice some more
- Thread starter MMike
- Start date
wtf?
so wrong on so many levels..
people can call the cops on a person walking on the street???? for a unarmed older guy at daylight on public space?? and cops have a "right" to stop you and ask you whatever the fuck they want just because you are walking on the street?...
and then, to tackle you into a wheelchair, just because.... even if you pose no threat and are not-violent and get away with it???
guy didnt speak english.... what if you are blind/deaf? or retarded?
so wrong on so many levels..
people can call the cops on a person walking on the street???? for a unarmed older guy at daylight on public space?? and cops have a "right" to stop you and ask you whatever the fuck they want just because you are walking on the street?...
and then, to tackle you into a wheelchair, just because.... even if you pose no threat and are not-violent and get away with it???
guy didnt speak english.... what if you are blind/deaf? or retarded?
Unfortunate introduction to "american freedom", poor guy.
He was lucky he did not get shot. Such are the ways of our finest nowadays.
Fucked up...
because miami-home of the face eating bath salts people
hopefully the new judge isnt as corrupt
http://www.wfmz.com/news/news-regional-berks/Charges-refiled-against-Reading-police-officer/40818452?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook_WFMZ
And how many plainclothes........
Maybe the DNC didn't require as many police officers as the RNC simply because the Dems aren't prone to brawling like the Repubs.
Odd though that a more racially diverse crowd would have less violence than an all white crowd. That just seems to counter what Trump, the GOP, and FoxNews have been touting. Hmmm...
Odd though that a more racially diverse crowd would have less violence than an all white crowd. That just seems to counter what Trump, the GOP, and FoxNews have been touting. Hmmm...
More freedom to police the police in China than some places in the US: http://www.scmp.com/news/china/policies-politics/article/1995447/chinese-free-film-police-long-they-dont-get-way
Prank stops are illegal, time for them to face the music: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2016/08/02/no-the-police-cant-pull-over-drivers-to-give-them-gifts/
https://thinkprogress.org/doj-report-baltimore-abuses-2c7ce74de9ce#.k1yp8nzg6
This just boggles teh mind.
This just boggles teh mind.
I think I saw Manimal!
Edit: I'd take the prison cell over being outside in Douglas, AZ.
Dafuq man. If you're that scared, get back in the car and wait for animal control.
If something comes at you with big teeth acting like it's going to take a bite out of you, you react. I have no problem with them doing this to an aggressive capable breed that presents a hazard. If the person can control their animal, it probably wouldn't happen. I doubt they would shoot a dog just out of spite, but when things happen fast, they are going to protect themselves.
And the of course the dog owner is going to say "but that's the first time he's ever barked/bitten/charged", etc.
Hella skeptical. People's connection to their animals is sometimes so strong that they stop perceiving reality correctly.
And the of course the dog owner is going to say "but that's the first time he's ever barked/bitten/charged", etc.
Hella skeptical. People's connection to their animals is sometimes so strong that they stop perceiving reality correctly.
So at least a medium sized to larger dog and you are telling me that they should risk rabies or an infection?
???
I'm tired of this "my dog can do no wrong" attitude.
Im not saying that could never happen. But people also happen to be sick of trigger happy cops.
Defending either side of the argument is pretty silly cause we both werent there obviously.
But you said "agressive capable breed" and i dont think a labrador fits the description really.
Defending either side of the argument is pretty silly cause we both werent there obviously.
But you said "agressive capable breed" and i dont think a labrador fits the description really.
I think it absolutely can, all it takes is the attitude, it's got the teeth to make it happen. All dogs can be protective and go into that "mode", while they may not understand that their perceived attacker is not trying to attack them.
I agree with the gun-happy cops, I think videos are bringing this out and the efficiency of modern communications is pulling the sheets back to reveal what has been going on all this time, but it requires significant evidence, like video, etc., otherwise I'd rather have the police defending themselves legitimately than being put in harm's way when responding to calls by people's pets. Because the gun-happy cops is a thing, as has been shown in many places, there's going to be tendency to think that's what's going on without considering the evidence or lack of. That's what I'd want to avoid. I have to be as objective as possible in my job, and evidence is what drives everything. One person that makes a claim isn't evidence, need more.
Not trying to defend the cop here, but I've got a Lab/Golden Retriever mix with some real stranger danger/aggression issues. If a cop shot Denver, as upset as I'd be, not real sure I could blame the officer. Now that being said, he's also not a "therapy dog" (see mandowns thread about dogs). I would presume that anyone claiming as such, would have a more mildly tempered dog.
Deliverymen don't have the same obligation to respond to people and situations. They can drop-kick your package over the fence.
It's odd how discussions of dogs and their owners get people all riled up and argumentative.
The average animal control officer isn't equipped with firearms and they also get along just fine without shooting dangerous animals. They might have pepper spray or blunt weapons but that's about it.
I volunteered in wild life rescue one year too and despite regularly working with dangerous animals I didn't need a firearm or kill any of them simply because I was ignorant/fearful/lazy.
Why would that be odd?