Stable genius. As long as you can still be classified as a genius when you don't understand basic geography of the country you supposedly lead.
Trump's Presidency 2017 - 2021
you really think he can count that high?
Clearly what I think of him has zero impact on the reality of the situation. Must be user error.
Hate to say it, but I think the best we can hope for is a temporary economic collapse this summer.
there, I said it.
there, I said it.
don't worry mitt....everyone on both sides still hates you....but you warned us about putin....so there is that....
He's gonna go on the list!
“It’s Payback Time”: With Acquittal Certain, Trump Plots Revenge on Bolton, Impeachment Enemies
Trump, says a source, wants Bolton to be criminally investigated for possibly mishandling classified information. Romney, Schiff, and Nadler are also in West Wing crosshairs.
He's gonna go on the list!
“It’s Payback Time”: With Acquittal Certain, Trump Plots Revenge on Bolton, Impeachment Enemies
Trump, says a source, wants Bolton to be criminally investigated for possibly mishandling classified information. Romney, Schiff, and Nadler are also in West Wing crosshairs.www.vanityfair.com
62% of New Hampshire Democrats say they’d prefer human extinction to 2nd Trump term: poll
Who says people lie in polls? Sixty-two percent of New Hampshire Democrats said they would prefer to see a large stray shooting star crash into Earth and end all human life than suffer through the …
www.nydailynews.com
Why not both?62% of New Hampshire Democrats say they’d prefer human extinction to 2nd Trump term: poll
Who says people lie in polls? Sixty-two percent of New Hampshire Democrats said they would prefer to see a large stray shooting star crash into Earth and end all human life than suffer through the …
One could see the two as cause and affect.
Is he air grabbing pussies?
No, he is making America great again!
Empty promises
Where Are They Now? These 23 Celebrities Said They'd Move If Trump Won
They talked the talk, but did they walk the walk?
townhall.com
Trump’s First 3 Years Created 1.5 Million Fewer Jobs Than Obama’s Last 3
New Labor Department statistics show that despite Trump’s repeated boasts, job creation was a lot higher during Barack Obama's final years.
6% Growth!
Trump’s First 3 Years Created 1.5 Million Fewer Jobs Than Obama’s Last 3
New Labor Department statistics show that despite Trump’s repeated boasts, job creation was a lot higher during Barack Obama's final years.m.huffpost.com
Your facts and data are useless against his dogmatic inflexibility armor.
Where can I donate money to the Human Extinction 2020 campaign?62% of New Hampshire Democrats say they’d prefer human extinction to 2nd Trump term: poll
Who says people lie in polls? Sixty-two percent of New Hampshire Democrats said they would prefer to see a large stray shooting star crash into Earth and end all human life than suffer through the …
well, their state motto is "live free or die". 62% seems a bit low.62% of New Hampshire Democrats say they’d prefer human extinction to 2nd Trump term: poll
Who says people lie in polls? Sixty-two percent of New Hampshire Democrats said they would prefer to see a large stray shooting star crash into Earth and end all human life than suffer through the …
Keep in mind when Obama became president millions of jobs were already lost due to the recession, real estate market crash from subprime loans. So while Obama was in office those jobs lost came back, because of the revolving economy. Obama told Trump when he was running for president and talked about creating new manufacturing jobs in the US, do you have a "magic wand?" Under Trump, more people are getting off food stamps, unemployment is at a 50 year low. Then again Kev, we all know how pro-Trump Huff Post is, LOL.Trump’s First 3 Years Created 1.5 Million Fewer Jobs Than Obama’s Last 3
New Labor Department statistics show that despite Trump’s repeated boasts, job creation was a lot higher during Barack Obama's final years.
Booming Trump economy is right time for able-bodied adults to trade food stamps for jobs
SNAP was designed as a lifeline for people in need, not a way of life for able-bodied Americans. Our new rule will continue to protect this safety net.
www.usatoday.com
Well if Sanders wins in 2020, 80% of your paycheck should help cover all the free stuff he promises everyone.
not because they are now better off financially, but because donnie and the GOP have made them more difficult to qualify for.
Manufacturing jobs are still down, and will continue to decline. they are not coming back in any appreciable numbers unfortunately. That's not due to dem Mexicans taking our yobs, it's about efficiency and automation as well as global competition.
People having their SNAP cut or benefits removed altogether is not the same "getting off food stamps".
I'd much rather see my tax money go to reasonable social help to the less fortunate than corporate tax cuts which have done NOTHING to benefit the typical citizen and WILL harm the economy long-term. Some people need help. I say we help them.
I know you know how the tax system works. Repeating this shit is a hollow argument.
it's not even an argument, it's blatant and baseless fear mongering
how else ya gonna rev up and "look, squirrel!" your base when you're out there trying to embiggen your cronyism and cut energy deals in the middle east?
As it should be, able bodied people should in fact get off their lazy asses and find a job. Don't take the benefits from disabled people who actually need it. This also does not include morbidly obese people who are too fat & lazy to move and eat shit food everyday and put themselves in that situation. I watch that 600lb life show every once in a while, I am in awe though watching them plow through all that food in one sitting.
no, it's basically a purge, because you, like the rest of the GOP, hate poor people.
So you're saying if you're capable of working, but choose not to because you can make the same collecting government assistance you might as well take from someone who really needs it?
show me where i said that. please, i'll wait.
fraud controls are already in place. you're perpetuating the lazy welfare recipient myth. while fraud *does* occur, it's at such an insignificant rate that any further controls cause more harm to the people who truly need the support than they do at preventing fraud.
case in point: states that tried to implement drug testing policies for welfare, etc, actually spent more money on the testing than they saved as a result of removing anyone that failed the testing.