That's what I was thinking.Where the hell do you put the bikes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Roof rack or trailer mount ?
Maybe Yakima makes a Ferrari version that is just painted red and costs eight times as much as a standard model.
That's what I was thinking.Where the hell do you put the bikes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
if they can put a hitch on a Gallardo, then why not a Ferrari?That's what I was thinking.
Roof rack or trailer mount ?
Maybe Yakima makes a Ferrari version that is just painted red and costs eight times as much as a standard model.
what the hell is that?!?!?!?I'm partial to one of these
720hp V-12
So wife would officially be a backseat driver now? Awesome......The Tramontana R made by some Spanish firm. 2400lbs, all carbon fiber, and a 720hp Mercedes V-12. Passenger sits behind the driver ala jet cockpit. Pretty sweet and only $450,000!
you would be wrong about the sh*tty curve.127hp/L NA is fairly impressive...anyone can bolt a giant turbo to a breathless engine like the VR and make massive numbers with a sh!tty curve.
I'll ignore the RM experts and normal drama and just say that I love this thing......now all I need is approx. $300K...
Ferarri makes more money from selling paraphenellia than cars (aka selling overpriced crap to suckers who could never afford an actual car).
They are a marketing firm that coincidentally makes really fast cars.
Discuss.
how can you compare NA power per L to Turbo???ok......whoopee
617hp 2.9L single turbo VR6 on race gas 212hp per L
450hp 2.9L single turbo VR6 pump gas 155 hp per L
it's a shame the head didn't like to stay on the engine.
the same way they did in the original posters linked story......how can you compare NA power per L to Turbo???
true...Honda did it nearly 9 years ago...of course it was only 120hp/ltr...127hp/L NA is fairly impressive...
please. Ferraris are the pinnacle of innovation, style and performance.agreed...I mean if a person really wanted a performance car they could spend about 200K less and whoop all over a Ferrari...Ferrari's are just "oh look at me" cars...IMO...D
lol..see my post above yours...but I will give them credit in the aero dept...Dplease. Ferraris are the pinnacle of innovation,
Dude - you're worse than an Apple fanboi.true...Honda did it nearly 9 years ago...of course it was only 120hp/ltr...
Honda fanbois are worse. i hate riceDude - you're worse than an Apple fanboi.
My VW had 13:1 comp. Good thing the head breathed like an asthmatic underwater with a pulmonary embolism.lol..I just notice the 12.5/1 compression ratio...say hello to race gas prices!!!
your just jealous. Macs aren't just a computer. They are a way of life.Dude - you're worse than an Apple fanboi.
dennis miller, is that you?Good thing the head breathed like an asthmatic underwater with a pulmonary embolism.
couldnt have said it better.Lets see... A Datsun or a Ferrari. That was easy.
it has nothing to do with being a fan of Honda's...but if you're going to start saying "leaders of innovation" it better be true...it's a fact that other car manufacturers have already done this long ago.Dude - you're worse than an Apple fanboi.
I love these names. Supercar, hypercar.comparing a race prepped car to a supercar or hypercar is silly
looks pretty lame:I love these names. Supercar, hypercar.
I want to drive a GNARCAR.
like I said earlier.....Ferrari's are just status symbols..."oh look at me I have a Ferrari"....the GTR is just as performance worthy and you save about 200k...it's called common sense...lol
please. Ferraris are the pinnacle of innovation, style and performance.
and what would you get for $200k less? say the car is going to be $300k, for $100k you can get a Viper ACR, over priced Corvette ZR1,[\B] Ariel Atom 3....
i dont believe i ever said Ferraris are the coolest care thing ever as you put it. the Zonda, Konneenniggssigg, Gumpert, SLR 722, Aston One-77 and Lambos are all sick and sexy cars in their own right. I do believe though that Ferraris do it with class and have that awe factor that other cars have to go beyond the realm of being normal to come close.i'm sorry...but that car is simply amazing. i'd say it's mostly worth it. (the engineering at least). however, your pompous ferrari-is-the-coolest-thing-ever-and-i-gag-on-their-collective-cock attitude is really ridiculous. it's a sexy car, but there are other sexy cars out there. and whats wrong with the nissan? mad that it could kick your little fanboy ass? cars, while it's great for them to be pretty, are machines. and machines are made to do a job. and the nissan does it better. sorry for bursting your bubble. and, as many people have said, when are you going to even drive that? let alone have enough money to think of buying it? at least the nissan is 'reasonable.' the ferrari is nice, but this thread sucks.
i'm not so much just justifying the nissan as a supercar (which it is, don't argue), as reveling in the ignorance of your attitude. but whatever. it's the internets. you've bought into their whole marketing scheme. and you're telling me you have enough money to buy a brand new ferrari? then do something good for other people with it, don't feed your ego. anyways, work called and said im supposed to be doing it . thread still sucks.*snipped