Looks like LA.
I just had a school bus move in one block away.
Looks like LA.
Could be any large US City. this one is on E12th st in Oakland by Laney CollegeLooks like LA.
I just had a school bus move in one block away.
nprImagine another American Civil War, but this time in every state
If America has another civil war, it is more likely to be a war within the states than between them. Citizens of any state of any size, red or blue, may not have to go far to find a fight.www.npr.org
Americans are fleeing to places where political views match their own
America is growing more geographically polarized — red ZIP codes are getting redder and blue ZIP codes are becoming bluer. People appear to be sorting.www.npr.org
Beating @kidwoo to the punch.Well, American Airlines is ripping out First Class seating on a few routes, so I guess that’s the beginning of revolution!
(and, at the same time, giving everyone else on the plane EVEN LESS legroom).
JFC
I'll take it every time. Usually get a meal and enough room to move. It's not very "special", but I'll take it. Last flight, there was an "overflowing" person next to me in 1st that definitely would NOT have worked in main cabin.domestic first class is worthless anyway
lie flat is the way. (but not needed short of Hawaii)
Not true, we have hypersonic shit now. And more stealth shit. Some new aircraft carriers too.Carl Sagan was right.... And nothings changed since then.
Moar is better.BTW you appear to have dropped from 18th to 50th in the child mortailty rankings....
PRO LIFE!BTW you appear to have dropped from 18th to 50th in the child mortailty rankings....
jackscompletelackofsurprise.gifNo shit.
50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study says
Tax cuts for the wealthy didn't boost the economies of the U.S. and 17 other countries — but they did worsen income inequality.www.cbsnews.com
No shit.
50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study says
Tax cuts for the wealthy didn't boost the economies of the U.S. and 17 other countries — but they did worsen income inequality.www.cbsnews.com
it's easy to say in hindsight that trickle down economics was a scam.No shit.
50 years of tax cuts for the rich failed to trickle down, economics study says
Tax cuts for the wealthy didn't boost the economies of the U.S. and 17 other countries — but they did worsen income inequality.www.cbsnews.com
it's easy to say in hindsight that trickle down economics was a scam.
its also easy to say it was a scam at the beginning, and in the middle too.
No shit, little beaver!'We are essentially in a new Gilded Age’: As workers get laid off, CEOs and shareholders gobble up hundreds of billions in profits
CEOs cite the need to downsize in a rough economy, but it seems corporations are doing better than ever.fortune.com
Maintenance de routine. Pas grave.'We are essentially in a new Gilded Age’: As workers get laid off, CEOs and shareholders gobble up hundreds of billions in profits
CEOs cite the need to downsize in a rough economy, but it seems corporations are doing better than ever.fortune.com
I have been saying it for a while. Its just when a rag like Fortune starts saying it, it starts to feel really creepy.No shit, little beaver!
Maintenance de routine. Pas grave.
this election was of the rebellion of Fishtown, of Poor America. it’s idiotic that they’d think Trump is better for them… but they know that the status quo hasn’t been working for them for decades.Last night while mulling over World Bank and census.gov data, trying to make some sense of our perceived poverty and the growing income inequalities as illustrated so nicely this month in Mother Jones, I had a thought:
What if we separate America into Poor America and Rich America with the cutoff at the 80th percentile of income? (I chose 80th percentile since that's the dividing line on the Mother Jones charts where stagnation occurs below and growth has been occurring above, for better or worse. I also chose it because I'll be comfortably above that line.)
Let's run with this idea a bit:
How do the demographics of these two "nations" differ? Clearly they differ in income, so that's not the crux of the matter: We also know that Rich America's incomes are growing rapidly while Poor America remains stagnant. Although the dividing line is at the 80th percentile, what percentage of population lies in each group? How old are these people? What do they do?
What's the size of each nation's tax base? I know many relatively rich, right-wingers who like to whinge about the tax system being overly progressive, but is Poor America's tax base enough to cover its proportion of services of the combined nations?
What about educational attainment, teenage pregnancy, health outcomes? If we view these things as cultural values that Poor America continues to cling to rather than dismissing them as mere sequela of socioeconomic status can we come to any conclusions?
How much immigration is there between Poor America and Rich America? In other words, how much relative economic mobility is there between the lower four quintiles and the top quintile? Also on the topic, does one live in such a nation by virtue of birthright, akin to how citizenship works in most countries?
How are unemployment and disability rates in each nation--how many of the now-unemployed were living in Poor America beforehand and how many did not pass Go and went straight from Rich America to the unemployment line?
How do these countries fare on the world scale if we consider them alone? (I know there's that map out there that compares states' gross state product to various world countries' GDP.) Is Poor America the size of, say, Canada, and Rich America the size of Japan?
Clearly, at some level this view falls apart: services are shared, the labor of one "nation" almost entirely goes to benefit those who live in the other, and Poor America is burdened with a legion of elderly people who, lacking savings, plop themselves on the public dole once they become eligible for SS and Medicare. On the other hand, Poor America probably has a demographic advantage (the flip side of Japan's problem) with an overrepresentation of young, fertile, but poor immigrant families.
Finally, does this thought exercise clarify anything?
I'm not certain of the answers to any of these questions, although I think I know the answers to some of them. Will my stereotypes bear witness to reality? Stay tuned over the next several days as I try to sift through data and figure out some answers.
They're still outnumbered by non-executivesI can't believe none of us have made an "Incredible Violence Man" joke yet.
Fatal shooting of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson prompts wake-up call for nation's executives: Experts
The targeted killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson has sparked worry in C-suites across the nation.abcnews.go.com
And by "wake up call" they mean "hiring private security for executives and passing the cost onto the consumer".