v10"o-PlEaSuRe said:Anyone got any...anything looking good/bad, fast/sketchy. i missed my ride so i want details!!
40 ft double =Number of Riders competing = 145
Number of Riders clearing the last doubles = 3
biker3 said:Well the 4x is surely to be the biggest of the season. And the DH is gunna be RENNIE Im almost positive. The course is so wide open a big guy like him will have the advantage.
Oh yeah and the 4x guys should be on fullys and have there nuts in a wad. I dont care who you are i GARUNTEE even gracia is having second thoughts about those last doubles. The are like 02 Sea otter big.
I know Germany was big, On a DH bike yes. Wait till you see pics of the last doubles at Angel Fire. They look like doubles that you would see on a moto track. 40 ft doubles with lips taller then me 1 after another on a 4x track is BIG, not to mention the other really sweet doubles on the top of the track.sayndesyn said:You want big, try Willingen. One pro broke there leg on the double in practice. No one hit it during the race. Nuff said.
Not just FS bikes, but I beat everyone will be wearing their fullface helmets. I wonder how many pros will be putting on their flat pedals? I remember the X-Games BMX DH track, only one pro hit it with clipless pedals.biker3 said:Well the 4x is surely to be the biggest of the season. And the DH is gunna be RENNIE Im almost positive. The course is so wide open a big guy like him will have the advantage.
Oh yeah and the 4x guys should be on fullys and have there nuts in a wad. I dont care who you are i GARUNTEE even gracia is having second thoughts about those last doubles. The are like 02 Sea otter big.
the muscular one who is gonna grab your head and pop it like a zit for questioning his setup.... :love:blt2ride said:Not just FS bikes, but I beat everyone will be wearing their fullface helmets. I wonder how many pros will be putting on their flat pedals? I remember the X-Games BMX DH track, only one pro hit it with clipless pedals.
BTW, which pro broke their leg?
That was at the CHILI CHALLENGE. Which isnt going to have WC level riding.Cant Climb said:So this year all theese 4x tracks are "better" because they have giant moto jumps.....?.......and now no one is even jumping them......?.....except like 3 guys....
I'm with you on this. The courses are better because they put work into them for once, but if no one is jumping them..what's the point?Cant Climb said:So this year all theese 4x tracks are "better" because they have giant moto jumps.....?.......and now no one is even jumping them......?.....except like 3 guys....
Agreed. This course has TONS of passing and what not. There are PLENTY of spots for carnage as well. If Gracia developed the gate that lopes and prokop have I think hed be winning A LOT more 4x races.Transcend said:I'm with you on this. The courses are better because they put work into them for once, but if no one is jumping them..what's the point?
You need a course 90 of guys can ride fluidly, go big on, but also one that races well and isn't won by whomever snaps at the gate.
The race shouldn't be won because one guy had bigger balls or because there are only 4 guys int he world capable of jumping part of the course. Let's be honest, lopes, gracia and prokop are on a different level (with a few others) then most of the rest of the best. (wow, didn't make too much sense there).
That's interesting...not too sure where you're going with this...bizutch said:the muscular one who is gonna grab your head and pop it like a zit for questioning his setup.... :love:
Unless the jobs are built incorrectly, I don't see any reason why no one would be jumping them. It's nice to see a 4X course that has real jumps...Transcend said:I'm with you on this. The courses are better because they put work into them for once, but if no one is jumping them..what's the point?
You need a course 90 of guys can ride fluidly, go big on, but also one that races well and isn't won by whomever snaps at the gate.
The race shouldn't be won because one guy had bigger balls or because there are only 4 guys int he world capable of jumping part of the course. Let's be honest, lopes, gracia and prokop are on a different level (with a few others) then most of the rest of the best. (wow, didn't make too much sense there).
Edit: missed that this was at the chille challenge..thought you meant in practice this week.
Ditto, everytime there are big jumps most get their panties in a bundle for no reason...if a couple guys can do it, then it is possible for any pro. If a few can not then they need to think about racing XC or playing checkers. This is not a sport for those with no balls or skills. One certain pro I know spends most of his days doing gate starts, practing corners and most importantly jumping jumps...the bigger the better, trying to jump them as fast as possible while of course clearing them....if all these other suckas are gonna cry about it, then they need to try harder or go home.blt2ride said:Unless the jobs are built incorrectly, I don't see any reason why no one would be jumping them. It's nice to see a 4X course that has real jumps...
I guess it is progression...... building these tracks is tuff and it seems like things are moving in the right direction. It isnt all about building giant BMX tracks though. Recently, it looks like you could hold UCI 4x and UCI Downhill BMX the same weekend on the same track.....Transcend said:I'm with you on this. The courses are better because they put work into them for once, but if no one is jumping them..what's the point?
You need a course 90 of guys can ride fluidly, go big on, but also one that races well and isn't won by whomever snaps at the gate.
The race shouldn't be won because one guy had bigger balls or because there are only 4 guys int he world capable of jumping part of the course. Let's be honest, lopes, gracia and prokop are on a different level (with a few others) then most of the rest of the best. (wow, didn't make too much sense there).
Edit: missed that this was at the chille challenge..thought you meant in practice this week.
Big jumps are necessary but not if only 2 guys are clearing them......and guys are snapping their legs.....if there that big it makes the sport look not so good...stiksandstones said:BUT, they do need to built properly AND big...the sport will NEVER have any progression without big air-that is a fact, hate to break it to you whining babies.
Stiks is right, it's all about progression. This track will favor the riders who spend more time jumping and riding tracks than those riders who spend most of their time on road bikes.stiksandstones said:Ditto, everytime there are big jumps most get their panties in a bundle for no reason...if a couple guys can do it, then it is possible for any pro. If a few can not then they need to think about racing XC or playing checkers. This is not a sport for those with no balls or skills. One certain pro I know spends most of his days doing gate starts, practing corners and most importantly jumping jumps...the bigger the better, trying to jump them as fast as possible while of course clearing them....if all these other suckas are gonna cry about it, then they need to try harder or go home.
BUT, they do need to built properly AND big...the sport will NEVER have any progression without big air-that is a fact, hate to break it to you whining babies.
Problem is, if there is a bottleneck on the drop right before the three large doubles, they might not have the choice to hit them. At the Chile Challenge during the pro heats, it was common to see the first two guys having to roll the doubles because they were getting tied up, and then the guys trailing would have the speed to pass over the doubles. I think BCD got some footage of this. It's a great course design, I can't wait to see who wins it. It's one of those courses where anyone can be in contention until the very end.blt2ride said:Stiks is right, it's all about progression. This track will favor the riders who spend more time jumping and riding tracks than those riders who spend most of their time on road bikes.
I feel confident that most of the pros will be hitting these doubles come race time...
Ross didn't even race. Broke his c-bone (i think) in practice.stiksandstones said:You guys are talking "chile challenge"...I am going to take a guess and say the fastest guy there was Ross Milan, not neccesarily a world cup contender-just wait to see the top guys in the world, I am sure all will be fine and they will make it look easy...have one of these while you are at it.
stiksandstones said:Ditto, everytime there are big jumps most get their panties in a bundle for no reason...if a couple guys can do it, then it is possible for any pro. If a few can not then they need to think about racing XC or playing checkers. This is not a sport for those with no balls or skills. One certain pro I know spends most of his days doing gate starts, practing corners and most importantly jumping jumps...
****ing retarded. Thats horrible. :mumble:dondon said:sorry to bum you guys out - but the argument is moot - as they ploughed the last straight - and dummed down the last three jumps - too bad - its now way to easy.
Dh was fast and dry - people just checking lines etc, extra rocks piled up in rock sections since chile chalenge.
Expect to see some big booming hip jumps photos. Spomer was on it!!
dondon said:sorry to bum you guys out - but the argument is moot - as they ploughed the last straight - and dummed down the last three jumps - too bad - its now way to easy.
Dh was fast and dry - people just checking lines etc, extra rocks piled up in rock sections since chile chalenge.
Expect to see some big booming hip jumps photos. Spomer was on it!!
I guess you two have made up? :love:blt2ride said:Stiks is right, it's all about progression.
That's weak! If the jumps could have been rolled, they should have left them. The riders who wanted to hit them could do so, and the others could roll them. It's not like they were "do or die" jumps.Sherpa said:****ing retarded. Thats horrible. :mumble:
it's not like they have motors and 250 cc enginesblt2ride said:That's weak! If the jumps could have been rolled, they should have left them. The riders who wanted to hit them could do so, and the others could roll them. It's not like they were "do or die" jumps.
WheelieMan said:Problem is, if there is a bottleneck on the drop right before the three large doubles, they might not have the choice to hit them. At the Chile Challenge during the pro heats, it was common to see the first two guys having to roll the doubles because they were getting tied up, and then the guys trailing would have the speed to pass over the doubles. I think BCD got some footage of this. It's a great course design, I can't wait to see who wins it. It's one of those courses where anyone can be in contention until the very end.
Did you see Supercross 15 years ago? those SX guys looked at the jumps and said "no way can we jump them"....then one guy did, another, then 10 more, now everyone...It is really quite simple.ekozy39 said:Why does every thing in DH,4X etc need these huge jumps to progress? Look at SX, the sport MTB aspires to be like. They don't have any jumps that the last place pro couldn't do. They are all reasonably spaced according to the riders abilities. Just b/c JS, RC or CR do them with ease doesn't mean they stretch them out another 20-30 feet. They do have sections that create options(double in, triple out, triple in double out, etc) and that makes things intereting.
When this sport was at it's peak in the mid-90's it was all about good racing and DH was on more natural terrain. I'm not saying no jumps but bigger isn't always better. I would imagine we would have more success if we looked back at how things used to be (promotion, courses, events) and try to rebuild that rather move away from what made the sport strong.