Nice try the A line is weak go RS line, she can't drive the flagship healthfully she doesn't need the entry line. Why bother wasting on unpractical automobile, she'll do fine in the G200 or Ford Ranger.
Yes... I'm sure you would, Procreator.A7 is beautiful, but oh so tiny in the back seat. I'd take an A6 over an A7 if both were offered to me for free, but that's just me.
ThxNice.
Is it just an 80% scale version of an A7?
No - it's a stretched A5 on an A4 frame.Is it just an 80% scale version of an A7?
Are they selling them in the US? I've never seen one here.
A4 through the A8 all use the same MLB platform.
They're shown on the audiusa site. I'd not seen that before N8 posted.Are they selling them in the US? I've never seen one here.
pure genius, right here.A4 through the A8 all use the same MLB platform.
VW/Audi have perfected platform engineering and basically only make two different cars, MQB or the MLB. The bigger the number on the nameplate is just a reference to their larger profit margin.
Not yet, supposedly they will and supposedly they are going to bring back Avants to the US. If they do, I may have to go for an RS4, but it remains to be seen whether this will happen . My 4-series Grand Coupe is the same idea, hatchback (why don't all cars have this?) and lower/sleeker than the regular sedan built off the platform (A4/3-series).Are they selling them in the US? I've never seen one here.
the back end looks recycled from a early phaeton design that had virtually no trunk...
hatchback-sedans trunks make a of sense in my book.View attachment 125933
I has trunk. Normal trunk is good, better opening than my Camaro obviously, with seats down and divider out, ginormous and I can put any of my bikes in there, which I occasionally do during the winter for long trips. Took two huge coolers today to the fish processing place to get our salmon smoked and canned. What really seals the deal is how easy it is to convert it to full hatchback mode with the seats down. Concept is like the S7 and Panemera, although those two are crazy more money obviously and a bit bigger.
I did design this car for those people that want better visibility, easier to get out/in, more cargo space, more upright seating, etc., especially for those that complain about such things on sporty cars:
View attachment 125934
Not yet, supposedly they will and supposedly they are going to bring back Avants to the US. If they do, I may have to go for an RS4, but it remains to be seen whether this will happen . My 4-series Grand Coupe is the same idea, hatchback (why don't all cars have this?) and lower/sleeker than the regular sedan built off the platform (A4/3-series).
View attachment 125931 View attachment 125932
you must not know about the ///M Factor ...I looked at the BMW GC but was turned off by the dated tech and the exterior is due for a refresh.
Fortunately, I'm immune to paying a huge markup for marginal performance gains in real world driving.you must not know about the ///M Factor ...
Really?Fortunately, I'm immune to paying a huge markup for marginal performance gains in real world driving.![]()
Cool - I love those!Really?
Cuz you could have gotten pretty much the same drivetrain in a VW Golf.
Ouch!the audi "sport"backs are only marginally less ugly than the bimmer ones and the honda crosstwerk
A Honda Accord is 0.1 seconds slower to 60 mph for about $10K less.Ouch!
I actually dig the look of the A7 and the A5 Sportback, but $45k for a 2.0 liter engine in a mid size sedan seems a bit steep.
Nope - and Honda/Accura need to up their design game.A Honda Accord is 0.1 seconds slower to 60 mph for about $10K less.
But N8 doesn't pay for marginal performance.