Believe it!
Cain/Gingrich 2012!
- Thread starter Hello Kitty
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2dumb2troll
Christ, you're not even good at trolling.
Cain confirms reports of sexual harassment claims
The new pubic hair on the Coke can....
(does that date me that I know that reference?)
The new pubic hair on the Coke can....
(does that date me that I know that reference?)
we have a winner.
Fvck I'd love to see those two running together, I really want to see Obama get a second term
I knew I kept you off my ignore list for a good reason.
Must spread rep...
personally, I think Gingrich/Limbaugh would stand a good chance.
^^^They would certainly embody the fat politician caricatures that have been drawn for the last 150 years...
I'd be afraid that their gravitational pulls would cause them to collapse upon themselves and create a black hole.
$tinkle's like George Lucas at this point. It's going to take more than one hit to erase the memories of all the tired and uninspired crap he's put out going through the motions recently...
Oh absolutely. He's still one of the cleverest conservative dumbfvcks around though. Gotta give him that.
they're already a black hole of common sense.
Oh please show me where I can drink from the well of liberal enlightenment!?
One thing you could sat about a Cain/Gingrich ticket, they would certianly have the high ground when it comes to sexual morality issues.
Yeah..... Cain's done. Accused of sexual harassment is bad enough (Clarence Thomas). Paying off your accusers (plural) to have the case dropped is *really* bad politically. Between that and the video of the drunk Perry from Friday night, I'm pretty sure that Romney is automatically the nominee.
Ann Coulter's penis.
Public library. Not that you'd ever be caught dead in such a socialist institution.
if nothing else, they'd be a black hole of oxycotin.
Can you show me the law that forces you to be liberal when you are against radical right wingers? Especially that US radical left wing is the center in many yurpean countries.
Sorry we are not going to have the left choose our candidate. Just the notion that the left somehow likes Romney and would begrudgingly accept him as the nominee all we need to know that Romney is not the candidate for the GOP.
As you will notice every frontrunner has been attacked about someting Bachman about her foster kids Perry about some rock on a deer lease and now some unsubstantiated sexual harrassment rumors about Cain however...in all this time zero, zilch, nada on any thing on Romney Hmmmmm...
Sorry fooled us back in 08 with McCain won't fool us this time besides between sunday night and monday night Herman Cain had record setting campaign contributions. Liberals will always tell us whom they fear the most because thats who they will attack most viciously.
I may be an outsider but from what I see in yurp it's the republicans who start to play the who slept with who game. Liberals couldn't care less about other people personal life. To run a country you have to be qualified and inteligent. Not friends with jesus and have an A+ in his magical notebook.
maybe in intelligent, well educated countries. the 'tards here in the US want someone they can relate to, someone they would want to have a beer with, go to the titty bar with, and bang rails of a hookers ass in a bathroom stall with.
so what you're saying is that instead of nominating a candidate that would actually have a very likely chance at winning the election, you'd rather go full retard. interesting.
except when it comes to smoking, diet, and socially offensive thoughts
i take great comfort the right will not judge me for being an overweight, emphysemic racist.
Unfortunately it slowly happens here. They still don't want the titty bar guys to run the country but they inteligence or educated person was used as a negative term by our "republican movement" party and the most popular politicians are the most bland ones who basicly do nothing but are nice and clueless. I'm also quite worried we are close to a 2 party system. With similar 2 big parties that are center right wing like the democrats and far bonkers right wing like republicans. Fortunately a party with modern social views and center right wing economic views (in here we still need to deregulate the markets as now they still suffer from post-com overreggulation) got ~10% in the last election.
TBH. I think the future are flexible parties. Not left or right wing. Not "socialist" or "free market" but reacting to the markets and societies needs according to what happens. I'm suprised even Fukuyama belives it and has recently distanced himself from the republican movement. He helped to create it, belived it but after it didn't work realised it instead of blindly following it like a religion. I have to say I have much respect for him for admitting he was wrong.
I don't really care about the 1st and 2nd. As for socially offensive things why would they? If you show that you have a social sensitivity of a brick you should not have the power to make social policy. Isn't it obvious?
What's funny is that it's *going* to be Romney as the nominee, and then the rest of the right-wing 'tards are going to trip over themselves talking about how GREAT a nominee he is, and how conservative he is, and how...
I'm guessing Noonan will lead the charge.
I'm guessing Noonan will lead the charge.
And don't forget that evil liberal fvcker Karl Rove with all those 'black baby' phonecalls in the 2000 primary. Liberals always out ta get them publicanz when deys runnin gainst each other. There's no need to.
You're too dumb to realize that everything you just mentioned is SOURCED from Romney's campaign. I mean really, all those candidates BUT Romney would be the best thing anyone on the left could ever hope for.
Cain or Bachman? Are you fvcking serious?
That would be awesome!!