Doesn't Dia Comp actually own the patent CC uses?Should that read Cane Creek's patent expires?
yea, that was mentioned in the article.Doesn't Dia Comp actually own the patent CC uses?
http://chrisking.com/files/pdfs/Int20HeadsetsExplained.pdfbut they still don't make any integrated headsets...
Well sure, but who else has Sotto Voce Colorways?So we're being encouraged to jump on the CK bandwagon just because they've finally gotten in step with the rest of the world . . . when there are so many just-as-good-but-less-expensive alternatives out there? Meh.
What, and King is the first company that you can think of that does this? People are springing for Avy internals/ TLD Helmets/ $400 pedals/ XTR or XO stuff/ Nicolai frames/ blah blah blah...the list goes on of products that cost more but are arguably no better than cheaper competitors. At least with King its a small fraction of money over a competitor.So we're being encouraged to jump on the CK bandwagon just because they've finally gotten in step with the rest of the world . . . when there are so many just-as-good-but-less-expensive alternatives out there? Meh.
I have to agree with you, I used a king headset on my home made, chromoly bike with an un-faced headtube (didn't have a lathe yet). sporting a monster T for 5 years. I finally cracked the lower cup during a crash. CK makes good stuff, I have never used a headset for that long otherwise.What, and King is the first company that you can think of that does this? People are springing for Avy internals/ TLD Helmets/ $400 pedals/ XTR or XO stuff/ Nicolai frames/ blah blah blah...the list goes on of products that cost more but are arguably no better than cheaper competitors. At least with King its a small fraction of money over a competitor.
Fact is King headsets have EARNED the reputation they have by performance, not internet hype. This update is a good and overdue one, unlike so many posted "upgrades" that are mostly fluff.
Only the unknowledgable would argue about some of the products you mentioned. A gain is a gain no matter how small(ie pedals, mechs). Quality might not always have a gain in performance, but may perform longer. I don't think Avalnache with at least longer service life was a worthy mention. I won't start a sh!t fight saying how superior the Avy cart will make a fork. The service life and durability is enough.What, and King is the first company that you can think of that does this? People are springing for Avy internals/ TLD Helmets/ $400 pedals/ XTR or XO stuff/ Nicolai frames/ blah blah blah...the list goes on of products that cost more but are arguably no better than cheaper competitors. At least with King its a small fraction of money over a competitor.
Fact is King headsets have EARNED the reputation they have by performance, not internet hype. This update is a good and overdue one, unlike so many posted "upgrades" that are mostly fluff.
That makes things clearer . Let's examine another patents that are to be expired in the near future and let's tip who will come with what 'revolution' after that. Rohloff Speedhub vs. Shimano/Sram tandem are the my candidates."The threadless headset is U.S. Patent 5095770, which is owned by Cane Creek Cycling Components, and expires on September 29, 2010"
Source: http://reviews.mtbr.com/blog/cane-creek-110-is-review/
Just a comment: Nicolai offers 5 years warranty, no question asked, on their frames. Pretty unusual IMO. And they can build you all their models in custom sizes, not many big bike manufacturers can claim this.What, and King is the first company that you can think of that does this? People are springing for Avy internals/ TLD Helmets/ $400 pedals/ XTR or XO stuff/ Nicolai frames/ blah blah blah...the list goes on of products that cost more but are arguably no better than cheaper competitors. At least with King its a small fraction of money over a competitor.
True, they earned the reputation on road and hardtail bikes when the competition offered (nearly) unsealed headsets. But now we have 2010, long travel forks and everybody else's products evolved to the point that they are equal to King in terms of durability but perform without flaws with 8" forks.Fact is King headsets have EARNED the reputation they have by performance, not internet hype. This update is a good and overdue one, unlike so many posted "upgrades" that are mostly fluff.
I think the main thing is that they actualy still work after 5 years. Easily some of the most well thought out stuff out there. And, no marketing hype around them at all. Just good designs, real engineering, and surreal craftsmanship.Just a comment: Nicolai offers 5 years warranty, no question asked, on their frames. Pretty unusual IMO. And they can build you all their models in custom sizes, not many big bike manufacturers can claim this.
Frankly, I like supporting a made-in-the-USA company with environmentally conscious manufacturing practices who encourage their employees to practice sustainable, healthy lifestyles. Plus they build their products and supply their warehouse to ensure that small parts are always available, order-able, and replaceable.Fact is King headsets have EARNED the reputation they have by performance, not internet hype. This update is a good and overdue one, unlike so many posted "upgrades" that are mostly fluff.
After reading this load of BS from King my hate for CK headsets has reached an all time high, and yes I'm a hater on this one. And no, I don't give a **** if you've been running one for a million years!
Cane Creek is Dia Compe. One and the same. Cane Creek was a branding that occured around the mid-90's to get away from the generic name and develop high end componentry, wheels, etc if I'm not wrong. I seem to remember lots of people thinking "Dia-Compe" was an Asian brand.
So what's the rule on a patent when it runs out? Does the owner just have to buy the rights all over or re-file for extending it? Or does the intellectual property just became open source?
20 years ago, Dia Compe introduced the world to threadless headset technology. The intertwined history thread of the Aheadset, Dia Compe and Cane Creek are quite interesting. In the mid 70’s Dia Compe opened a facility in Fletcher, NC to supply brake parts to some bike manufacturers. Around 1990 Paul Turner had Dia Compe build and distribute the Rock Shox RS-1 fork. John Rader, the designer of the Aheadset system, gave exclusive licensing to Dia Compe for the product, which Chris King and Hatta started to build. Dia Compe USA becomes a separate entity from Dia Compe Japan, making their headquarters in Fletcher. After a few years, Rock Shox ended its relationship with Dia Compe, soon Dia Compe starts building Aheadsets themselves. In 1996 the Cane Creek brand name was introduced in addition to Dia Compe. Later in the early 2000’s Cane Creek became the wholly used name.
So what's the rule on a patent when it runs out? Does the owner just have to buy the rights all over or re-file for extending it? Or does the intellectual property just became open source?
And too bad they bet the farm on the higher-quality Beta, eh?when my old company invented VHS, it was a free-for-all after our patent rights ran out.
lol wut?And too bad they bet the farm on the higher-quality Beta, eh?
amen, i love my King too, had it for just under 11 years, no problems, and several bikes.meh, ive had no issues for 11 years with mine. ive had tons of issues with Hope's though. hopefully my new CC XXc will fix them
SC Syndicate and the Athertons seem to be doing fine with them tooamen, i love my King too, had it for just under 11 years, no problems, and several bikes.
Um, the question with their "traditional" headsets is long term durability. Pointing out that WC teams, who can replace headsets after every weekend, use them is retarded.SC Syndicate and the Athertons seem to be doing fine with them too