Well again we are arguing apple and oranges here, but you do bring up a good point!Easy. Because one can; and because some people will simply want to buy at the high-end for the sole fact that it is high-end. Hardly a new idea idea, and one can find such examples in almost any consumer market.:huh:
I agree that your above statement is probably true, but I certainly do not think that is the most honest way to market or sell a product especially with long term customer loyalty in mind, yeah sure you and I know exaclty what we are getting with either fork, but what if we didn't? Would we be utterly dissapointed to find out that a good portion of the $1400 we spent on the fork was marketing for suckers?. Lets assume the manufacturing costs are app the same, and the performance gains of the WC over the Team are truly negligible, then the only other way (besides the marketing practice of jacking the price on a "high end" product to make it seem special or whatev) Rockshox could justify the large markup in price over the Team is by the larger forecasted warranty costs of the WC over the Team, which agian is just another great argument for buying the Team over the WC.