on paper it might be true that a floating brake will let the suspension remain more active through braking bumps and thus will slow you down quickly and with more control. this is not to say that in reality your wheel will not step out to the side or chatter over the top of bumps, a floating brake will not glue your rear wheel to the ground. that being said it is entirely possible that it's effect on your bike will go completely un-noticed. let's face it, dh bikes aren;t braking on pavement or predictable sufraces, there is so much going on when a bike is slowing down that having rear suspension that is slightly more "active" may not make one ounce of practical differance. if you're hitting bumps that are already using up all your available suspension, or are not even comming close, is a floater going to make a noteworthy differance? no. if your braking technique is crap will it make a differance? no. if you drag your brakes all the time will it help? yeah, it might. . . but you'll be off the back anyway if you ride like that. i would bet most of the guys on here saying floaters aren't necessary or noticable are semi-pro and pro racers whose ability pretty much negates the need for floaters anyway . . .
if you want one, buy one. the fastest guys don't use them because they don't notice the benefits or simply compensate naturally. saying you "need" a floating brake to go as fast as possilbe is like saying you have to ride a Sunday, or Maxxis tires, or flat pedals. . . .
i actually disliked the feeling of the floater on my 223, it felt like i lost feel for the rear wheel. i like the back end to sink when i hit the brakes (this is what barel's floater is designed to do, by the way), since the front is doing the same thing. and if the rear suspension gets a little stiffer, big deal, i bottom my rear shock out probably a dozen times per run anyway so it's not like i'm going to notice.
whatever makes you feel fast, or cooler than your friends, i suppose. but remember, the less you use your brakes the less of an effect the floater is going to have.
and yeah, this nonesense about riders going "seconds" faster with floaters is just that. nonesense. . . . or spam
if you want one, buy one. the fastest guys don't use them because they don't notice the benefits or simply compensate naturally. saying you "need" a floating brake to go as fast as possilbe is like saying you have to ride a Sunday, or Maxxis tires, or flat pedals. . . .
i actually disliked the feeling of the floater on my 223, it felt like i lost feel for the rear wheel. i like the back end to sink when i hit the brakes (this is what barel's floater is designed to do, by the way), since the front is doing the same thing. and if the rear suspension gets a little stiffer, big deal, i bottom my rear shock out probably a dozen times per run anyway so it's not like i'm going to notice.
whatever makes you feel fast, or cooler than your friends, i suppose. but remember, the less you use your brakes the less of an effect the floater is going to have.
and yeah, this nonesense about riders going "seconds" faster with floaters is just that. nonesense. . . . or spam