Do you have any samples pictures or examples?Yup, the fork will be a unicrown very similar to the old Koski forks. The blades I have are a large diameter, thin wall tube and will give the bike a nice ride when on rigid. Rigid forks work in "splay". 29er forks that are suspension corrected (long) need to be a large diameter to keep a reasonable amount strength and rigidity. A quick frame builders engineering axiom, increase a tubes WALL THICKNESS by a factor of x, strength goes up by x and rigidity goes up by x. Increase it's DIAMETER by x, strength goes up by 2x and rigidity goes up by 4x. Now you know why aluminum frames have big tubes, to increase strength and reduce the amplitude of frame flexure. This is done to give aluminum frames an acceptable fatigue life. That is why they ride like they do. Have you ever seen an aluminum spring? If I have my son do a drawing in Solid Works of both a unicrown and a segmented fork with the tubing profiles I'm sure we would get a real engineer's take on the flex characteristics in each fork. I can tell you that the fork with the largest diameter blades will be the stiffest. If the blades diameter tapers, we can see where the fork blades will flex the most. Those early Koski forks has a large diameter at the dropout and because of this the front brake had a great feel. The bent fork blades had less of a tendency to "unwind" with the brake on. This kept the pad stable on the rim. I want the big diameter at the dropout to add strength and rigidity for the disc caliper.