Must spread rep? How can this be??!White people are so funny when they get ****ed over by the man.
Where's your messiah now, Flanders?
Actually reverse racism would be a white person loving people of other colors and inherently hating/distrusting/stereotyping white people (you know, like Silver). Not that the poor oppressed whities prone to using the term use it that way, but that is what it would mean if it were a real thing.No such thing as "reverse" racism...that'd be racial egalitarianism. There's just plain old racism, whichever way it's going... (end semantics)
I thought that was bizarro racism?Actually reverse racism would be a white person loving people of other colors and inherently hating/distrusting/stereotyping white people (you know, like Silver). Not that the poor oppressed whities prone to using the term use it that way, but that is what it would mean if it were a real thing.
Naw that's option 2 of the kansas city phenomenon™.I thought that was bizarro racism?
Sorry, I don't. Could you explain. Even with my amazingly high standardized testing scores I don't know everything.What was he doing in San Diego for a couple of days, huh? We all know what that means...
I wonder what parts are bad exactly. The sexy parts, or the oppressive, lying, governmental ones?edit: I just listened to his sermon and he actually recommends NOT reading 1984 because "it has some bad content."
Donkey show in TJ. Bank on it...What was he doing in San Diego for a couple of days, huh? We all know what that means...
edit: I just listened to his sermon and he actually recommends NOT reading 1984 because "it has some bad content."
I hate everyone, although I do hold a special place of hate in my heart for white people.Actually reverse racism would be a white person loving people of other colors and inherently hating/distrusting/stereotyping white people (you know, like Silver).
As long as it's a male donkey and a female hooker, everyone still goes to heaven. (So long as they regret doing it or buying tickets to see it, that is...)Donkey show in TJ. Bank on it...
And what would you suggest...? Perhaps rules and laws defining conduct and consequences for breaking those laws...? Perhaps a free media to report on news stories so that people can see what's going on to the extent that they care to know?maybe it is just me. i always get all uptight when i hear about fellow crackerz gettin the beat down from the (hispanic-sounding-last-named) man. my bad.
So what am I talking about in saying, "Why are we permitting this sort of thing to happen here?"
I am talking about the bigger picture. I am talking about cops asserting whatever authority they want and then you had better comply or you will be forced to. It doesn't matter what your rights are. Your rights don't matter.
You could comply and complain later, or stand up for your rights and take a beating... either way you are wrong, and they are justified, and will be found to have reasonable cause or whatever. Unless maybe you have some video of what went down, or maybe even if you do, it probably doesn't matter anyhow.
Every funking day there is a new story about how some cop beat somebody bloody or maybe even killed them, but hey it's just a few bad apples, right?
Sounds like a pervasive and systemic issue to me.
Oddly enough, it's how it does work. However there are injustices in the world, and sometimes criminals get away, whether out of uniform or in uniform.I like your first suggestion Mike. It sounds like how things are supposed to work.
In a Bivens lawsuit, it comes from the officer. If the government determines an officer was clearly or willfully acting outside his Constitutional authority, an officer loses qualified immunity. Department settlements are different, of course, but many times outside settlements are made against very specious claims because it's cheaper than going to court in the end, right or wrong.Let me address the issue of payouts you mention. So, right or wrong, when there is a payout made, where does the money come from? The officer's personal account?
A local TV station posted links to his other you tube videos. He likes to try to antagonize cops and border patrol agents. Seems like he got what he wanted.seems like numbnuts refused to get out of the car. refusing to do what an law official tells you what to do is generally not going to end up well.
i have no sympathy for this guy, it seems like he just wanted to make a scene.
Unless he provoked them in a way that presented a physical threat, neither being an asshole nor refusing unlawful search are grounds for the beatdown he got.A local TV station posted links to his other you tube videos. He likes to try to antagonize cops and border patrol agents. Seems like he got what he wanted.
J
I watched some of them. It really looks like someone asserting their constitutional rights to me. Maybe he is provoking even, but still always seemed to be within his rights.A local TV station posted links to his other you tube videos. He likes to try to antagonize cops and border patrol agents. Seems like he got what he wanted.J
delivering drugs or illegals?I pass through it twice a month...
Hahaa, yes you're right. Citizens are expected to comply with the law. Amazing huh? You're right on the first half. The beat down? No, it should have been handled better.which brings us back to my original point.
citizens have no rights. comply or expect a beatdown.
these are the only 2 choices. which is really no choice at all.
Indeed he is a moron. He thinks he's above being questioned so decides not to answer any, then get's pissed when the cops question his motives as to why he won't answer questions.This self-proclaimed Messiah of Constitutional rights is a ****ing moron and an egotistical attention whore of the first order, whether or not the police beat him without cause. Nonetheless, if they did, I hope they pay an appropriate price, whether it's time on the beach, loss of pay, loss of a job, or being his butler for the next year.
If the police searched my car without a warrant, any evidence would be thrown out. If they used "probable cause", they better be able to prove it.which brings us back to my original point.
citizens have no rights. comply or expect a beatdown.
these are the only 2 choices. which is really no choice at all.
Well then, you may as well just actually go find the constitution and rip the 4th amendment right out.Also, I may be wrong here but isn't refusing a search probably cause that you have a reason to be searched?
I think you had better check your constitution on that one.Also, I may be wrong here but isn't refusing a search probably cause that you have a reason to be searched?
Wait, people are arrested for refusing to be searched? What would the charge be?The problem is you only hear about the situations that go South. You don't get You Tube video's of people being peaceably arrested for refusing a search.
Right, because most of the time people comply because they know they have no real choice in the matter.Most of the time, the above doesn't happen, and police searches go on every day across the country.
And you generally don't get your ass beaten by the police, right or wrong, if you follow Chris Rock's simple rules in the first place.