blue said:"The pros do it". So? Who gives a damn? Does that mean I should go shoot up on some blood boosters tomorrow? The pros can screw themselves, I'll do whats best for me. I used to ride with an HRM, and it threw me off, I was always paying too much attention to the goddamned numbers on an LCD screen and not to my riding. My HRM would tell me one thing, so I'd slow down or speed up my cadence/pace, and I would feel like I was riding over or under my potential instead of exactly at it. My body is dynamic, while all the training manuals I've read seem to think I'm quite the static individual, same day after day. I ride with a cyclocomputer that tells me how far I've gone and my average speed, that's about it.
FitCycles are really inaccurate. First, they feel nothing like a real bike, and someone is not going to sit the same on a fake bike as they will on a real one. It only shows the rider in a stationary, flat position and not in a climbing, sprinting, or ascending stance.
Lookie:
http://www.sheldonbrown.com/kops.html (Bontrager article)
Looks like I found a candidate to mow my lawn.