that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot?
that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot?
most economies double every 10 to 12 years, so you are saying we are set back in our economic development by 1/2 normal rate, ie., 200% normal over the next 20 years or 8/4 in your math language.
most economies double every 10 to 12 years, so you are saying we are set back in our economic development by 1/2 normal rate, ie., 200% normal over the next 20 years or 8/4 in your math language.
that's ironic you would find fault with his post then go on to assert the non-existence of a negative. did you have afternoon tea from russell's teapot?
Unlike Bertrand's teapot, Adam's invisible should be noticeable by its effects. Sadly these are not present, nor is a free market a perfect system. Such are the realities of economics, even for the USA.
I'm not convinced that describing invisibility as a negative is entirely accurate.
well plaid.
i think we should take this somewhere else; these plebes can't appreciate our collective dizzying intellect. i'd recommend cheeseman park, but don't want to have to explain to Serial Midget & loopie what we're doing there.
well plaid.
i think we should take this somewhere else; these plebes can't appreciate our collective dizzying intellect. i'd recommend cheeseman park, but don't want to have to explain to Serial Midget & loopie what we're doing there.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.