Wait what happened to my tara picture as well. RM did you do this, damn you and your godlick admin powers
look what i got (chris king porn)
- Thread starter manhattanprjkt83
- Start date
What was so bad about the pic? I didn't see it but I'm just curious...
manhattanprjkt83 said:you guys are gonna love me. uploaded it to my server and everything; enjoy
mod edit: don't post it again.
let theing begin. Sorry to all the girls on the board, I had to... :eviltongu
Nothing it was just a full size version of my avatar :devil: :mumble:punkassean said:
5 years, nope the bike one cam,e out before Julie started. However I helped redesign the the lift for the tow truck, and Brent has a car named after his middle name, and Brent is also on the packagingdh girlie said:
Its just been recommend by several car manufactures to use Chevron products in their cars. Its manufactured as a Top tier gas. (The highest of the top 3 oil companies in the nation.narlus said:
Careful...your clever way to avoid the filters might have your thread deleted.manhattanprjkt83 said:
Although why don't ya just email that full version to me please. So I can make it my wallpaper.
jsbsmail@yahoo.com.
I feel for you though. Every forum I've read on has selective rule management. I wouldn't take it personal. Clearly there was no nudity, but it was looked at as inappropriate. Nothing like the rear end with a thong in my face, and definitely not the girl licking a vigina covered by a christmas hat.
What rule was broken by posting a bikini/underwear pic?
Not trying to stir the pot just genuinely curious.
Would it be ok to post a hyperlink and specifically label it NWS???
Not trying to stir the pot just genuinely curious.
Would it be ok to post a hyperlink and specifically label it NWS???
Yeah I have been on thepunkassean said:
for a long time now, and i never found things of that nature were not tolerated. Look at orven avatars i mean cmon...i dunno, not a big deal, just didnt expect it to get deleted.
The good news is the mod who took it down noted it and also made it clear not to repost it. That eliminates any confusion if nothing else. there have been many instances in the past where things jut vanished w/o a trace.
However I still think it may have been a little bit "preemptive" if anything.
However I still think it may have been a little bit "preemptive" if anything.
...and!?manhattanprjkt83 said:
but if we only hold ourselves to those standards...mace2 said:
I think it just surprises most people because CK is a solid company that always take the high road. Their facilities are top-notch environmentally, and they offer incentives to employees who ride to work based on how far they ride to get there.
I think what people aren't realizing is that for CK to interrupt the regular operations by doing this pink batch they probably already lost X amount of profit. So the baseline has already been reduced. I'm not really knocking them, I just think that something like $5 per would be more appropriate. Selle San Marco (I think) is offering pink saddles and they are giving a decent percentage to charity. (~20%).