It was meant entirely tongue in cheek.I can't tell if this is a tongue in cheek attempt at sarcasm, so I'm going to pretend that its not. It does seem to tick all of the right boxes for most of us who just want a bike that you can get out and ride instead of driving to a lift or shuttle which isn't always an option. Its nice to have a bike that is similar in feeling to your downhill bike to keep your skills in tune not to mention the fitness gains.
All are things you know I'm sure but no need to go lambasting someone because they pointed out the fact that a certain bike is pretty much exactly what numerous threads have been started on in seek of.
I like to suckThe Stumpy EVO is cool, but I want a frame only and I doubt they'll do one. Specialized build kits suck IMO, SRAM stuff, crappy DT rims and 15g spokes....yuck!
Can't have it.....
My 2003 SC Bullit called and wants its BB height back
function > fashionNo more pictures of ugly bikes please. Trail bikes are supposed look good. Save the ugly for DH bikes.
Anyone actually ride one of these?
Anyone actually ride one of these?
Looks like this bike would have an unreasonable amount of interaction between the pedals and the suspension.
Very interesting, but why does this remind me of a Scott Ransom?
because c-dales new engineer/designer used to work for scott....Very interesting, but why does this remind me of a Scott Ransom?
I didn't know that. This has promise then.because c-dales new engineer/designer used to work for scott....
and also, cannondale again with the lame terms... "over-mountain"?? <shakes head>