I think there is a mass recall or class action I read about, it was defect. I owned a VW for a few years starting in 99 and a taillight died in less than a yeari see sooooo many late model vws and audis driving around with one taillight out...
And thats one reason why I like it. Its 100% purpose oriented and suits a cyclist like nothing else that small.... the element is an awful, horrible, ugly mess of a box on wheels. .
you could have a brothel in the back of that thing!And thats one reason why I like it. Its 100% purpose oriented and suits a cyclist like nothing else that small.
Not enough clearance, not enough amenities, no fulltime AWD. And vomiting when you get into it just isn't fun. Although it's probably easy to clean.And thats one reason why I like it. Its 100% purpose oriented and suits a cyclist like nothing else that small.
Worm indeed, it's her decision. I'm leaning towards the hybrid. But we'll have to see. She likes those small carsARe you getting a new car or is Veronica?
What kind of Honda?
pensupnewcanofworms:
I agree, its a shoe box on wheelsOk, on the phone with her now, and we both agree that the element is an awful, horrible, ugly mess of a box on wheels. 3 strikes, it's out.
With the snow here, winter = offroading.Who ever said I'd be offroading it?
the Civic? I think the Prius is more affordable and gets more mpgWorm indeed, it's her decision. I'm leaning towards the hybrid. But we'll have to see. She likes those small cars![]()
I agree, its a shoe box on wheelslthumbsdown:
You have to drive a lot of miles to pay back the difference in cost and/or gas has to get to $4-5/gal soon after you buy the car. Plus there are plenty of very low emission SULEV and PZEV 4 cylinder cars (even V6s) with regular drivetrains that still get decent mileage and have more cargo room (no batteries to carry), better performance, and feature set. Most hybrids will drop 20-30% in their mileage ratings due to the revised 2008 real word EPA testing standards, so don't be wowed by their window stickers.the Civic? I think the Prius is more affordable and gets more mpg
The new EPA fuel economy regulations consist of the following three elements:
1. Revised testing procedures to more accurately reflect today's traffic conditions, driving habits and vehicle usage.
2. New labeling for window stickers to provide more information that is easier to understand.
3. The inclusion of SUVs and vans with between 8,500 and 10,000 pounds gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) in the testing process.
...
Revised testing procedures
The EPA has determined that changes to the testing procedure will produce fuel economy estimates that more accurately match what consumers will actually experience. The agency has also determined that important factors are missing from the current tests. Consequently, the new tests will include:
* Testing at higher speeds (up to 80 mph). Previously, speeds were limited to 55 mph to match the speed limit of the 1970s.
* More aggressive acceleration and deceleration (up to 8 mph per second rather than just 3.3 mph per second). The previous tests did not match today's hectic traffic patterns.
* Hot-weather testing and measuring vehicle fuel economy while using the vehicle's air conditioner.
* Testing in cold-weather temperatures while the vehicle's heater and defroster are operating.
Drivers will quickly notice a big difference between the fuel economy estimates using the testing methods prior to 2008 and the new testing methods.
* City ratings will drop by an average of 12 percent. The fuel economy estimates of hybrid vehicles and other vehicles designed for high fuel economy might drop up to 30 percent of their existing rating.
* Highway ratings will drop by an average of 8 percent while hybrids and other specialized fuel economy vehicles might be reduced by up to 25 percent.
I live in Toronto, Canada, and fwd seems to work 99.9% of the time even in our snowstorms. I'm 100% sure the simple 'awd' system would be more than adequate. The #1 accessory for winter driving is the tires,tire pressure (whereas the most important is obviously the driver) and since I'll be on roads I'm perfectly content with the system in the element. If I cared about 4wd performance, I wouldnt be looking at a Honda.With the snow here, winter = offroading.
You have to drive a lot of miles to pay back the difference in cost and/or gas has to get to $4-5/gal soon after you buy the car. Plus there are plenty of very low emission SULEV and PZEV 4 cylinder cars (even V6s) with regular drivetrains that still get decent mileage and have more cargo room (no batteries to carry), better performance, and feature set. Most hybrids will drop 20-30% in their mileage ratings due to the revised 2008 real word EPA testing standards, so don't be wowed by their window stickers.
Don't believe the hype plus the complete lifecycle of the vehicle the small clean 4 cylinder is better for the environment when the total dust to dust resource impact is tallied.
New plug-in multi mode hybrids could change this, but you probably won't see any until 08 or 09. Hell maybe they'll even have some clean diesel hybrids eventually now that the US has low sulfur diesel.
Check out the revised EPA mileage figures here...
EPA updates website tool to calculate realistic mileage figures based on the new 2008 EPA standards
True that! It's not an atractive car at all....it's all about function! It's not exciting at all. I thought it was the ugliest thing on the road, until I got inside one.And thats one reason why I like it. Its 100% purpose oriented and suits a cyclist like nothing else that small.
We'll agree to disagree with the idea of FWD being sufficient in bad weather. In my area, lack of AWD means you're not going to go anywhere during much of the winter. But if FWD works, more power to you.I live in Toronto, Canada, and fwd seems to work 99.9% of the time even in our snowstorms. I'm 100% sure the simple 'awd' system would be more than adequate. The #1 accessory for winter driving is the tires,tire pressure (whereas the most important is obviously the driver) and since I'll be on roads I'm perfectly content with the system in the element. If I cared about 4wd performance, I wouldnt be looking at a Honda.
I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last nightHow do you know so much about cars?
You're in Jersey, I should just have you find and haggle the price down for a new car!
Did you get a free continental breakfast?I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express last night![]()
Their free breakfast blowsDid you get a free continental breakfast?
I'm in the research phase of buying a new vehicle and I've found the best reviews are from people who actually own them. Here's the criteria thus far:
- Must be AWD or 4-wheel and good in snow
- Get at least 20mpg (4 cylinder is fine)
- Be able to fit a bike in the hatchback. I would also like a hitchrack. I'm single and don't plan on having kids anytime soon, so room for the bike is a must. Other than bike trips on the weekend, this will mainly be a commuter car.
- Doesn't have to be new
Tell me what you like and don't like! I plan to start test driving soon.
So far, I've got my eye on the new generation Subaru Outback and the Toyota Rav4.
That's bull$hit - buy a decent set of snow tires. How do you suppose people survived before the advent of AWD? Just rolled up into a fetal ball every time it snowed?We'll agree to disagree with the idea of FWD being sufficient in bad weather. In my area, lack of AWD means you're not going to go anywhere during much of the winter.
This is actually a good way to go - think of all the extra money you'll have.... even if repairs cost $5K you're still ahead.or you could go the "economy" route and get an older suby like mine for around $2k![]()
![]()
![]()
Here is a good resource:That's bull$hit - buy a decent set of snow tires. How do you suppose people survived before the advent of AWD? Just rolled up into a fetal ball every time it snowed?![]()
seriously....it always makes me wonder about people.That's bull$hit - buy a decent set of snow tires. How do you suppose people survived before the advent of AWD? Just rolled up into a fetal ball every time it snowed?![]()
If you are going to go used, buy the CRV its better than the prior generation RAV4.Anyone know how many mpg a Rav4 AWD 4cil. actually gets? I've heard everything from 22-30.
How are the older (past 3 years or so) Rav4s compared to the newer ones?
yeah, that'd be a rwd car, bub.FWD cars aren't so bad if you have good tires on them. I had an MR2 that was hilariously fun in deep snow with good snow tires.
Why buy more fvcking tires when you can have a set of ASRs and AWD? Gotta love storing a spare set of tires.That's bull$hit - buy a decent set of snow tires. How do you suppose people survived before the advent of AWD? Just rolled up into a fetal ball every time it snowed?![]()
It's always a matter of trade offs - FWD is cheaper, better mileage, less things to go wrong, etc.Why buy more fvcking tires when you can have a set of ASRs and AWD? Gotta love storing a spare set of tires.
The point here is...why buy a 2wd with electronic 4wd when there's MUCH better options out there? Having lived in the NE my entire life, AWD > snow tires, every time.
AWD ain't going to help you stop or turn. Snow tires will. And if you go with snow tires than you can buy true summer tires which will work better on dry roads and in rain than all seasons. Tires are key, and well worth some storage space.Why buy more fvcking tires when you can have a set of ASRs and AWD? Gotta love storing a spare set of tires.
The point here is...why buy a 2wd with electronic 4wd when there's MUCH better options out there? Having lived in the NE my entire life, AWD > snow tires, every time.
Sure it's cheaper, but it wasn't on the list, so why is that a valid point? The original request was a bike friendly vehicle with AWD and decent mileage.It's always a matter of trade offs - FWD is cheaper, better mileage, less things to go wrong, etc.
That being said - when it snows around here I *infinitely* prefer to drive the Subaru than the Honda. Although I've got simple all-seasons on the Honda due to the fact that in a normal winter I'll only see snowpacked roads occasionally.
Of course this winter the roads were snowpacked from Dec. 18th until some time in February.![]()
I'll disagree with the turning part - with a little "body english" an AWD car will turn in ways a FWD car won't.AWD ain't going to help you stop or turn.
If you're concerned about performance I'd agree... otherwise the all season radials are "adequate."Snow tires will. And if you go with snow tires than you can buy true summer tires which will work better on dry roads and in rain than all seasons. Tires are key, and well worth some storage space.
The hell AWD won't let you steer. You can steer out of a hell of a lot by giving gas to an AWD car.AWD ain't going to help you stop or turn. Snow tires will. And if you go with snow tires than you can buy true summer tires which will work better on dry roads and in rain than all seasons. Tires are key, and well worth some storage space.
Well, like any good thread, this one has moved beyond the original intent.Sure it's cheaper, but it wasn't on the list, so why is that a valid point? The original request was a bike friendly vehicle with AWD and decent mileage.
At least we haven't touched the "shaved junk" world yet.Well, like any good thread, this one has moved beyond the original intent.![]()
the phrase "suck it up princess" come to mind.Of course this winter the roads were snowpacked from Dec. 18th until some time in February.![]()
I hate to inform you... but you're frothing.The hell AWD won't let you steer. You can steer out of a hell of a lot by giving gas to an AWD car.
Again, AWD requirement, so FWD with snow tires is an absolute no.