I need some more opinions on the Scott Gambler 20 2010. I'm able to get 25% off bringing it down to $3000 CAD so I am really looking at it as a good choice, I just don't know how DH capable these frames are. Although its spec'd as "DH geometry" as well as the Gambler 10, it only has a smaller HT angle, and longer stem, and chain-stay length then their "FR geometry" for their Gambler 30. The wheelbase, and BB height are just as high as on the Gambler 30, and that's what worries me, because its higher and shorter then pretty much any other DH bike I can find. Is this a factor, or does it really make a difference?