What's especially funny is how many times I see you arguing on the internet with your chief point being that people shouldn't (for some reason or another) argue on the internet...
No, i am sitting here pointing out how incredibly pointless it is to bag on the guy regarding his speaking skills. Maybe hes really shy, or just a terrible speaker. Who cares? Its got nothing to do with the bike.
The chainstay comment could be totally bang on, but he didn't explain it right or use the right terminology. Either way, it doesn't matter. The bike rides well, wins races, and thats that.
You're acting like a tool (this post will probably get this thread closed but whatever). You hack on me for "arguing on the internet" when all I did was make a totally fair comment about a single totally UNfair comment of his, despite the fact that YOU are arguing on the internet, and now you bring up public speaking skills DESPITE THE FACT THAT I NEVER MENTIONED THAT. Get a clue or bugger off, take your pick.
BTW his chainstay comment was pretty damn clear. It was also wrong. Anyone with a clue about structural strength/stresses will be more than happy to attest to this. But since you're just making BS accusations because you got the idea that I'm somehow bagging what you perceive to be a capable bike (which I haven't, READ WHAT I SAID YOU TOOL), I'd advise a healthy dose of shut the f**k up.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.