cougars are much harder to scroreSo since you rode at one bike park in the States, you have a good handle of our terrain here? For the record Mammoth is one huge volcano, covered in pumas, not technical at all
cougars are much harder to scroreSo since you rode at one bike park in the States, you have a good handle of our terrain here? For the record Mammoth is one huge volcano, covered in pumas, not technical at all
I'll tell you what doesn't add up. You just based the your impression of American tracks on one rather unique mountain in Northern California. In a nation with a dozen mountain ranges, just under 500 ski resorts, a land area only about 150,000 square miles smaller than all or Europe, and a geography arguably more diverse, do you really think that makes sense? The same mountains that are home to the Whistler bike park and Bromont/MSA World Cups extend well into the US; mountains, of course, have no appreciation for international boundaries.With reference to the tracks and terrain over your way, they're nothing like over here. I rode in Mamoth with my brother in the summer, and the trails there were pretty basic in comparision to what we have over here. Not SO much to do with the gradient, but more to do with the technicality of the trails. We hired Demo8s, and not once did we really think that we were using the bikes to their full potential.
Nonetheless, the tracks could be fantastic for the WC - purely from a marketing POV. Lift access, easy for camera work, and a nice area for the pits. If exposure was what sponsors were looking for, then the type of tracks you guys have over there are better suited than our by a long way.
...So, something doesn't quite add up...
Ummmm I think you must have been riding the beginner trails at Mammoth or something (which admittedly is easy to end up doing - the trails are marked like total crap). Northstar is flat and smoother and easy, just has some chop and occasional rocky sections. If that's representative of European WC tracks then the videos sure do a great job of making them look about 100x harder than they actually are. There's some sections at Mammoth that are harder than anything at Northstar. The old pro course at Mammoth makes Northstar look like a flat paved road, or most other US resorts for that matter.So since you rode at one bike park in the States, you have a good handle of our terrain here? For the record Mammoth is one huge volcano, covered in pumas, not technical at all even though it is surrounded by 13,000 ft. peaks, i.e. the "exposure" you speak of. Northstar (three hours north) is as technical as any European WC track (and is only at 6,000 ft.)same can be said about places in the Rockies and on the East Coast. The problem has been re-stated 20+ times already. The money and terrain are there. The devoted following of bike racing is not, thus rendering our terrain mute, and taking the $ out of the equation . Thats great that we "invented" the sport, same can be said about baseball. And now, the U.S. doesn't compete on the international level, and is losing ground to Latin American countries as well as Asian countries in terms of player development. Just because you invent a sport doesn't mean you have unlimited entitlement to it. Be thankful for the love your sport gets over there in Europe. Its demand, not terrain, that dictates where these races land.
I can say True to this as well. I went to 2 of those races thanks to Michelin. Great times!!! The cool thing was all the tail gating going on. It was like being at a football game, just bigger. Everyone there was dressed up in their team colors and cheering them on.The stands were PACKED the 4 years that i went to the race there. Even in the grand stands where you couldnt see a thing, people were there. It was even a good time when only 6 cars were on the track.
Flatstar? Clearly you haven't been to a modern WC track in Europe or Canada then. Each of us likes to think our local trails are just like the classic WC tracks, but they aren't.Northstar (three hours north) is as technical as any European WC track (and is only at 6,000 ft.)
I think you mean pumice. Pumas are shoes, or cats.pumas stone, not the large predatory cat.
Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.Flatstar?
Are you kidding?I think you mean pumice. Pumas are shoes, or cats.
thank you. spoken from someone who has clearly biked there, not just talked to the bro-brah ski-bags that overwhelm this region.Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.
Northstar has plenty of really good pitch for dh trails. The problem is just that none of the existing routes stay on them for very long without zig zagging all over the place. Wouldn't be hard to just join up some of the existing steep sections for a more sustained pitch fest.
You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
Yer, OK. I agree the race was always a success, but eventually it all boiled down to the coorporations wanting more cash...noooooooope. It was because indy wanted to much of the cut and other things not lack of investors. The stands were PACKED the 4 years that i went to the race there. Even in the grand stands where you couldnt see a thing, people were there. It was even a good time when only 6 cars were on the track.
People like watching nascar in the US, not beautiful super engineerded super cars.
True that. I can think of a couple places around the states that would be somewhat representative of a WC track, and they aren't everyone's local spots I keep reading about on here.Flatstar? Clearly you haven't been to a modern WC track in Europe or Canada then. Each of us likes to think our local trails are just like the classic WC tracks, but they aren't.
That's why Dogbone is the only trail I ride there besides Karp.Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.
Northstar has plenty of really good pitch for dh trails. The problem is just that none of the existing routes stay on them for very long without zig zagging all over the place. Wouldn't be hard to just join up some of the existing steep sections for a more sustained pitch fest.
You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
well this spot you "keep reading about" is an enormous resort capable of such an event, both in terrain and accommodations (it seems as though you've been there so this shouldn't come as a shock). But I guess you only ride Karp and Dogbone so you must rule. You zinged me though, you must be core bro.True that. I can think of a couple places around the states that would be somewhat representative of a WC track, and they aren't everyone's local spots I keep reading about on here.
I really don't know what they've done with the bike trails because I've only skied at both places. It's obviously more in line with what the UCI looks for I guess (along with all the zillions of other things that come into play).That's why Dogbone is the only trail I ride there besides Karp.
Bromont looks like it's steeper for sure. Probably not Mt. St. Anne,
Yeah I'd agree with that, particularly MSA. Looks fast and rough, sure, and a decent grade for a DH course, but it seems so well built/laid out that it makes up for the lack of steepness. Looks like you COULD make it to the bottom fast without much pedaling except out of the gate. Helmet cams of the Bromont WC course looked a lot steeper in the wooded sections, even though every other helmet cam I've seen of the place looks pretty mellow.I really don't know what they've done with the bike trails because I've only skied at both places. It's obviously more in line with what the UCI looks for I guess (along with all the zillions of other things that come into play).
But they both seemed like flat assed east coast mountains with just a bunch of ski paths cut through trees.......JUST LIKE NORTHSTAR
EDIT: I don't even know why I'm typing this. Northstar under its current management would NEVER EVER in million years try to host a UCI event. And for all my complaints with how the place is run, that's one where I really can't blame them. Downhill Ben summed that part up pretty succinctly I think.
1998. I went and looked for it when I first moved here in 2000. Definitely steep and gnarly. Definitely completely grown over now.I'm curious about that oldschool Squaw Valley WC. I've always wanted to go up there and see if the course could still be found/ridden. Keep hearing horror stories about it, but that was a course that was run, what, almost 10 years ago? Completely different ballgame these days.
HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!! Now who doesn't love steep?hmmmmmm
Exactly.....both flat as shlt east coast style hills.hmmmmmm
Shhhh!HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!! Now who doesn't love steep?
exactly.Exactly.....both flat as shlt east coast style hills.
You blow up that northstar map to a similar scale as windham and they're pretty much indistinguishable.
See aboveYou really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
I kinda want to know what the turn out was at Squaw . Its crazy they had a 6 hour xc race here on L.I. two weeks ago ,they got 200+ riders and guess who won? Derrick Nobman(pro dh'er on a SS .This is the first race this promoter ever put up, it was a grass roots project not bad for the first time and was a usac event. My point is there are some eager promoters out there that can put us back on the map, with venues that are willing. too bad it came down to the 11th hour. Now there was talk of puma can we please see some Cougar pic's!!!!! It would be a nice changedid either of you attend the Squaw WC in '98? I have asked at least 10 riding buddies out here about it and it is apparently news to most of them. VERY curious as to what that was like. Long before I moved here, just curious as to what the spectator turn out was for such an occasion.
Just to play, I don't see bromont or msa on 3dskimaps.comSee above.
Just tried looking a bit too, couldn't find anything. There was some Youtube or Broadband sports channel that had highlights from all the WC's through the 90's that I was trying to find, but no such luck.edit: i searched all over for any footage of the Squaw track from '99. No luck. I remember watching it on TV and again in some video (Real Sick?), pretty nasty for its day especially being as loose as it is out there.
No, but you will find Killington, Jay, Sugarbush, Mad River, and Sugarloaf. All pretty much on par with both.Just to play, I don't see bromont or msa on 3dskimaps.com
It's the fact that nowhere else in the Bay area has anything rocky or technical at all. Just relative perspective.No, but you will find Killington, Jay, Sugarbush, Mad River, and Sugarloaf. All pretty much on par with both.
Anyway, all sort of silly, but it started with someone proclaiming Northstar was somehow as tech as any Euro WC round and went on from there.
Will never figure out what it is about that place that everyone from there loves and visitors can't seem to figure out. Not a bad place to ride by any means but its online rep seems to be awfully inflated.
Nope. You missed it if you're referring to me. My point was only that there's nothing about the pitch of northstar that is is any different than other mountains that regularly host UCI races. I'm not saying that because I love the place, I'm saying that because I've been to Bromont and Mt saint anne, and as far as pitch alone goes, they're indistinguishable. And that your 'flatstar' label comes from skiers, not anything to do with the biking there. That's just the truth. Surely you understand the difference.Will never figure out what it is about that place that everyone from there loves and visitors can't seem to figure out. Not a bad place to ride by any means but its online rep seems to be awfully inflated.
there is a bike trail on tucks??????? WOAHFIf steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!
In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
what do you think, 55 or 56 degree head angle? I can't decide.If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!
In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
Stay away from giant.what do you think, 55 or 56 degree head angle? I can't decide.
Optional base jumping pack? I haven't ever seen them without snow but I am sure that it would be insane.If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!
In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!