Quantcast

Windham USA World Cup…..on or off?!

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
With reference to the tracks and terrain over your way, they're nothing like over here. I rode in Mamoth with my brother in the summer, and the trails there were pretty basic in comparision to what we have over here. Not SO much to do with the gradient, but more to do with the technicality of the trails. We hired Demo8s, and not once did we really think that we were using the bikes to their full potential.
Nonetheless, the tracks could be fantastic for the WC - purely from a marketing POV. Lift access, easy for camera work, and a nice area for the pits. If exposure was what sponsors were looking for, then the type of tracks you guys have over there are better suited than our by a long way.

...So, something doesn't quite add up...
I'll tell you what doesn't add up. You just based the your impression of American tracks on one rather unique mountain in Northern California. In a nation with a dozen mountain ranges, just under 500 ski resorts, a land area only about 150,000 square miles smaller than all or Europe, and a geography arguably more diverse, do you really think that makes sense? The same mountains that are home to the Whistler bike park and Bromont/MSA World Cups extend well into the US; mountains, of course, have no appreciation for international boundaries.

One of the steepest, most technical tracks ever (the Champery of its time) was in Snoqualmie Pass, Washington only 45 minutes outside of Seattle. No surprise it was Steve Peat's first win.


as for yet another tired, misguided comparison between DH and F1, I can't be bothered . . . .
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
So since you rode at one bike park in the States, you have a good handle of our terrain here? For the record Mammoth is one huge volcano, covered in pumas, not technical at all even though it is surrounded by 13,000 ft. peaks, i.e. the "exposure" you speak of. Northstar (three hours north) is as technical as any European WC track (and is only at 6,000 ft.)same can be said about places in the Rockies and on the East Coast. The problem has been re-stated 20+ times already. The money and terrain are there. The devoted following of bike racing is not, thus rendering our terrain mute, and taking the $ out of the equation . Thats great that we "invented" the sport, same can be said about baseball. And now, the U.S. doesn't compete on the international level, and is losing ground to Latin American countries as well as Asian countries in terms of player development. Just because you invent a sport doesn't mean you have unlimited entitlement to it. Be thankful for the love your sport gets over there in Europe. Its demand, not terrain, that dictates where these races land.
Ummmm I think you must have been riding the beginner trails at Mammoth or something (which admittedly is easy to end up doing - the trails are marked like total crap). Northstar is flat and smoother and easy, just has some chop and occasional rocky sections. If that's representative of European WC tracks then the videos sure do a great job of making them look about 100x harder than they actually are. There's some sections at Mammoth that are harder than anything at Northstar. The old pro course at Mammoth makes Northstar look like a flat paved road, or most other US resorts for that matter.
 

FCLinder

Turbo Monkey
Mar 6, 2002
4,402
0
Greenville, South Carolina
The stands were PACKED the 4 years that i went to the race there. Even in the grand stands where you couldnt see a thing, people were there. It was even a good time when only 6 cars were on the track.
I can say True to this as well. I went to 2 of those races thanks to Michelin. Great times!!! The cool thing was all the tail gating going on. It was like being at a football game, just bigger. Everyone there was dressed up in their team colors and cheering them on.

I hope that I get to make another race sometime in the future....

As for DH racing in the US. Well a friend of mine said it best! If there was a Lance Armstrong of the US racing DH, then we would see some things change here. Look what he has done for Road biking in the US. The same as Tony Hawk did for Skate Boarding and Dave Mirra did for BMX freestyle. Their sports were dead before they made it big. They helped reshape their sports and help bring the sponsors back. For now it’s NASCAR, Football, Baseball, etc.

Cecil
 

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
Northstar (three hours north) is as technical as any European WC track (and is only at 6,000 ft.)
Flatstar? Clearly you haven't been to a modern WC track in Europe or Canada then. Each of us likes to think our local trails are just like the classic WC tracks, but they aren't.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Flatstar?
Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.

Northstar has plenty of really good pitch for dh trails. The problem is just that none of the existing routes stay on them for very long without zig zagging all over the place. Wouldn't be hard to just join up some of the existing steep sections for a more sustained pitch fest.

You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
 
Last edited:

John Jameson

Chimp
Nov 12, 2009
81
0
Right side of the Sierras
Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.

Northstar has plenty of really good pitch for dh trails. The problem is just that none of the existing routes stay on them for very long without zig zagging all over the place. Wouldn't be hard to just join up some of the existing steep sections for a more sustained pitch fest.

You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
thank you. spoken from someone who has clearly biked there, not just talked to the bro-brah ski-bags that overwhelm this region.
 

Downhill.Ben

Chimp
May 18, 2009
22
0
Newcastle, England
noooooooope. It was because indy wanted to much of the cut and other things not lack of investors. The stands were PACKED the 4 years that i went to the race there. Even in the grand stands where you couldnt see a thing, people were there. It was even a good time when only 6 cars were on the track.

People like watching nascar in the US, not beautiful super engineerded super cars.
Yer, OK. I agree the race was always a success, but eventually it all boiled down to the coorporations wanting more cash...
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
Flatstar? Clearly you haven't been to a modern WC track in Europe or Canada then. Each of us likes to think our local trails are just like the classic WC tracks, but they aren't.
True that. I can think of a couple places around the states that would be somewhat representative of a WC track, and they aren't everyone's local spots I keep reading about on here.
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
Yeah adopt a name given by skiers for the SKI terrain compared to places like squaw, alpine meadows and kirkwood, and just pretend it has something to do with bikes. Good plan.

Northstar has plenty of really good pitch for dh trails. The problem is just that none of the existing routes stay on them for very long without zig zagging all over the place. Wouldn't be hard to just join up some of the existing steep sections for a more sustained pitch fest.

You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
That's why Dogbone is the only trail I ride there besides Karp.

Bromont looks like it's steeper for sure. Probably not Mt. St. Anne,
 

John Jameson

Chimp
Nov 12, 2009
81
0
Right side of the Sierras
True that. I can think of a couple places around the states that would be somewhat representative of a WC track, and they aren't everyone's local spots I keep reading about on here.
well this spot you "keep reading about" is an enormous resort capable of such an event, both in terrain and accommodations (it seems as though you've been there so this shouldn't come as a shock). But I guess you only ride Karp and Dogbone so you must rule. You zinged me though, you must be core bro. :shocked:
 
Last edited:

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
I've been to Northstar, plenty. It would sure have the accommodations for it, but hardly the trails. It basically needs a fall-line built down the hardest sections on the hill for a WC caliber course.

Don't underestimate me... I'm SO 'core brah...b!tches don't know.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
That's why Dogbone is the only trail I ride there besides Karp.

Bromont looks like it's steeper for sure. Probably not Mt. St. Anne,
I really don't know what they've done with the bike trails because I've only skied at both places. It's obviously more in line with what the UCI looks for I guess (along with all the zillions of other things that come into play).

But they both seemed like flat assed east coast mountains with just a bunch of ski paths cut through trees.......JUST LIKE NORTHSTAR :D

EDIT: I don't even know why I'm typing this. Northstar under its current management would NEVER EVER in million years try to host a UCI event. And for all my complaints with how the place is run, that's one where I really can't blame them. Downhill Ben summed that part up pretty succinctly I think.
 

John Jameson

Chimp
Nov 12, 2009
81
0
Right side of the Sierras
I have always felt that it would only take minor mapping to make a wc caliber course there.The Karpiel/Dogbone,/Sticks&Stones area would be ideal in my opinion, especially when it is compared to places like MSA. I'm not underestimating you, it just turns out that most people on bike forums talk directly out their 17 year old ass...With all this being said, there is no way a place this far west in America is going to hold an event a week after MSA. If Windham doest happen, I really don't see this WC at any other place than Bromont.
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
I really don't know what they've done with the bike trails because I've only skied at both places. It's obviously more in line with what the UCI looks for I guess (along with all the zillions of other things that come into play).

But they both seemed like flat assed east coast mountains with just a bunch of ski paths cut through trees.......JUST LIKE NORTHSTAR :D

EDIT: I don't even know why I'm typing this. Northstar under its current management would NEVER EVER in million years try to host a UCI event. And for all my complaints with how the place is run, that's one where I really can't blame them. Downhill Ben summed that part up pretty succinctly I think.
Yeah I'd agree with that, particularly MSA. Looks fast and rough, sure, and a decent grade for a DH course, but it seems so well built/laid out that it makes up for the lack of steepness. Looks like you COULD make it to the bottom fast without much pedaling except out of the gate. Helmet cams of the Bromont WC course looked a lot steeper in the wooded sections, even though every other helmet cam I've seen of the place looks pretty mellow.
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
I'm curious about that oldschool Squaw Valley WC. I've always wanted to go up there and see if the course could still be found/ridden. Keep hearing horror stories about it, but that was a course that was run, what, almost 10 years ago? Completely different ballgame these days.
 

gemini2k

Turbo Monkey
Jul 31, 2005
3,526
117
San Francisco
I agree that most WC courses are probably a bit steeper than some of the mountains mentioned in the U.S. But I said it before and I'll say it again, Canberra proved you DON'T need Alpine mountains to put on a good show. That race was amazing with almost no steep sections, very little vert, and lots of pedaling.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
I'm curious about that oldschool Squaw Valley WC. I've always wanted to go up there and see if the course could still be found/ridden. Keep hearing horror stories about it, but that was a course that was run, what, almost 10 years ago? Completely different ballgame these days.
1998. I went and looked for it when I first moved here in 2000. Definitely steep and gnarly. Definitely completely grown over now.


But again.....who cares about steepness. Where were the world champs this year and one world cup last year held? The lesson I take from that is that terrain has very little to do with venue choice in some cases. EDIT: what he^ said.

There's just no money in it here to motivate someone to do what it takes to host. And THAT is what the american way is in a nutshell.
 

John Jameson

Chimp
Nov 12, 2009
81
0
Right side of the Sierras
did either of you attend the Squaw WC in '98? I have asked at least 10 riding buddies out here about it and it is apparently news to most of them. VERY curious as to what that was like. Long before I moved here, just curious as to what the spectator turn out was for such an occasion.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Exactly.....both flat as shlt east coast style hills. :D


You blow up that northstar map to a similar scale as windham and they're pretty much indistinguishable.....discounting the 'steep' side of northstar where none of the bike trails are.


Lower left zone is the where the old squaw course is for reference. Definitely different.

 
Last edited:

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
Exactly.....both flat as shlt east coast style hills. :D

You blow up that northstar map to a similar scale as windham and they're pretty much indistinguishable.
exactly.

You really think bromont or mount saint anne are steeper? They're not.
See above;)



edit: i searched all over for any footage of the Squaw track from '99. No luck. I remember watching it on TV and again in some video (Real Sick?), pretty nasty for its day especially being as loose as it is out there.
 
Last edited:

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!

In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
 

BUNKERCHUNKS

Monkey
Apr 8, 2008
217
0
EAST COAST
did either of you attend the Squaw WC in '98? I have asked at least 10 riding buddies out here about it and it is apparently news to most of them. VERY curious as to what that was like. Long before I moved here, just curious as to what the spectator turn out was for such an occasion.
I kinda want to know what the turn out was at Squaw . Its crazy they had a 6 hour xc race here on L.I. two weeks ago ,they got 200+ riders and guess who won? Derrick Nobman(pro dh'er on a SS :thumb: .This is the first race this promoter ever put up, it was a grass roots project not bad for the first time and was a usac event. My point is there are some eager promoters out there that can put us back on the map, with venues that are willing. too bad it came down to the 11th hour. Now there was talk of puma can we please see some Cougar pic's!!!!! It would be a nice change:D
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
edit: i searched all over for any footage of the Squaw track from '99. No luck. I remember watching it on TV and again in some video (Real Sick?), pretty nasty for its day especially being as loose as it is out there.
Just tried looking a bit too, couldn't find anything. There was some Youtube or Broadband sports channel that had highlights from all the WC's through the 90's that I was trying to find, but no such luck.

Stikman, you know where to find any of this stuff?

One of the coolest courses I've ridden was Upper Velocity at Mammoth. It was fairly easy to tell where the start was. It's the only sanctioned racecourse I've ever seen that had braking skidmarks out of the gate.....fvcking awesome. That one sorted the men from the boys very easily.
 

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
Just to play, I don't see bromont or msa on 3dskimaps.com
No, but you will find Killington, Jay, Sugarbush, Mad River, and Sugarloaf. All pretty much on par with both.

Anyway, all sort of silly, but it started with someone proclaiming Northstar was somehow as tech as any Euro WC round and went on from there.

Will never figure out what it is about that place that everyone from there loves and visitors can't seem to figure out. Not a bad place to ride by any means but its online rep seems to be awfully inflated.
 

Kanye West

220# bag of hacktastic
Aug 31, 2006
3,741
473
No, but you will find Killington, Jay, Sugarbush, Mad River, and Sugarloaf. All pretty much on par with both.

Anyway, all sort of silly, but it started with someone proclaiming Northstar was somehow as tech as any Euro WC round and went on from there.

Will never figure out what it is about that place that everyone from there loves and visitors can't seem to figure out. Not a bad place to ride by any means but its online rep seems to be awfully inflated.
It's the fact that nowhere else in the Bay area has anything rocky or technical at all. Just relative perspective.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Will never figure out what it is about that place that everyone from there loves and visitors can't seem to figure out. Not a bad place to ride by any means but its online rep seems to be awfully inflated.
Nope. You missed it if you're referring to me. My point was only that there's nothing about the pitch of northstar that is is any different than other mountains that regularly host UCI races. I'm not saying that because I love the place, I'm saying that because I've been to Bromont and Mt saint anne, and as far as pitch alone goes, they're indistinguishable. And that your 'flatstar' label comes from skiers, not anything to do with the biking there. That's just the truth. Surely you understand the difference.

I'd never defend a mountain that as a business and as a form of biking infrastructure flails so wholeheartedly and fully as that place. I for one see that place as so much wasted potential it makes me sick to my stomach.

EDIT: Plus what hack said^
 
Last edited:

wiscodh

Monkey
Jun 21, 2007
833
121
303
If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!

In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
there is a bike trail on tucks??????? WOAHF
 

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!

In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
what do you think, 55 or 56 degree head angle? I can't decide.



We're off topic, but Windham was getting boring anyway . . . life supports about run out and we're all just sitting around waiting for it to die anyway.
 
Last edited:

ChrisKring

Turbo Monkey
Jan 30, 2002
2,399
6
Grand Haven, MI
If steepness is somehow the only requirement for 'uci style' courses, you guys on the east coast need to get out to tuckerman's ravine this summer and get that trail in!

In meantime I'll get a course scratched in on the palisades at squaw. Tires won't even touch dirt for about 70 feet off the start. The UCI just CAN'T say no!
Optional base jumping pack? I haven't ever seen them without snow but I am sure that it would be insane.

Anyway, I don't get this whole needs to be steep BS. Big balls, no brains or go home.

So where's the race? I just read another 5 pages and don't see it. Nice pic above btw. That's the best thing Squaw has going for it verses Alpine Meadows.