he better own half the company after a tattoo like that.It might be stupid, but do you know how much he gets paid by monster? A ****load.
Exactly... No effin way that was ten hours. If so he got jacked from the artist. I have one that has WAY more detail in it, and it was only about three.Explain how that takes 10 hours? i can draw that in 15 seconds
If the Monster company paid for it, I'd be taking as long as possible too.Exactly... No effin way that was ten hours. If so he got jacked from the artist. I have one that has WAY more detail in it, and it was only about three.
Only way that was a ten hour sesion is if he needed a ten minute break every five minutes.
that tattoo would definitely not be easy to remove. that would take countless laser sessions and there would be a scar from that.Easy to remove.
but my small tattoo has way more detail and only took 4 hoursHis twitter feed has pics and they are moving onto the green, prob why, if its real, that it took 10 hours.
WIN!!!What a monsterosity.
I think he has room on his forehead for that.Wow... considering it's Dyrdek you would think it would be a giant DC logo or something.
youre kidding right?It's Rob Drydeck, or whatever his name is. He is a talentless dude who got rich from doing stupid publicity stunts.
To fill in that much area takes time in and of itself, regardless of level of detail. The biggest factor is the artist themselves.......they all work at different speeds. The area of that back piece filled in is probably equivalent in area to my whole sleeve, which took about 30-35 hours total (then again a lot of that was outlining/shading).....but even still....but my small tattoo has way more detail and only took 4 hours
sorry, i thought the sarcasm was obvious when i made that comment.To fill in that much area takes time in and of itself, regardless of level of detail. The biggest factor is the artist themselves.......they all work at different speeds.
not much blood and no redness really. they also looked surprisingly "fresh" after 10+hours of chair time.I think I sort of agree......it was hard to tell, but the inked area didn't appear to be swollen/raised like it should have been. Wierd.
i wouldn't consider that to be a deciding factor. I bleed very little when I get ink done.not much blood and no redness really. they also looked surprisingly "fresh" after 10+hours of chair time.
not saying its a deciding factor but something large will probably tend to bleed just a bit...especially after 10 hours of sitting.i wouldn't consider that to be a deciding factor. I bleed very little when I get ink done.
i think those of us with tattoos know what you mean(hard to explain what I mean).
i know exactly what you mean. keep in mind, the degree of swollenness tends to depend on how long a particular area has been worked. for a piece that covers that much area with so little work (for the line work at least), I wouldn't expect a substantial amount of swelling.Yea I don't bleed much either (not at all really).....but his back should have definitely shown to be swollen where inked. There was a couple camera views showing the "contour" of the skin between inked and uninked skin.....and there was no raised areas that I could tell (hard to explain what I mean).
it also depends on how heavy of a hand the artist has. judging by the color saturation on the green (and the quality of the shading) I'd say that artist wasn't very heavy handed (at least for that portion).not saying its a deciding factor but something large will probably tend to bleed just a bit...especially after 10 hours of sitting.
ive had some work thats bled a lot and some that didnt.
i think those of us with tattoos know what you mean
i know this, but something that large regardless of how heavy the tattooers hand is, would show a lot more rawness/redness to the skinit also depends on how heavy of a hand the artist has.
a back tattoo pretty much sucks. especially in the fatty area since its so sensitive. shading over that large of a area is serious regardless of how stupid the tattoo is.I'm not sure how well the back retains ink, but coloring in that much area could take a ton of time going back over areas where ink didn't stick. I know my elbow and sternum were like that, then again it's basically just skin over bone, so not much flesh to retain the ink.