Quantcast

Necrophilia is Natural

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
fluff said:
You can't get a woman pregnant by oral sex, anal sex or manual stimulation of the clitoris. At certain times of the month you haven't a hope in hell.

So bioligically....
Some men and women are simply unable to reproduce as well.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
You can't get a woman pregnant by oral sex, anal sex or manual stimulation of the clitoris. At certain times of the month you haven't a hope in hell.

So bioligically....
Correct. But there is the argument that these acts promote a stronger hetero mating ritual and therefore promote impregnation. The same cannot be said of homos.
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
If you could read, you'd see that I have no problem with anyone getting it on.
We dont always outlaw discrimination against people. We dont allow pedophiles to be gradeschool teachers or retards to become airline pilots.
And there's a difference. Pedophilia is defined as a mental disease, not a born trait. Retardation is also a born trait, but it's apples and oranges compared to homosexuality.
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
These are also exceptions or "minorities"
Well, you don't object to two hetero people who can not physically reproduce, and you don't call it a crime, so why do you object homosexual behavior and call it a crime?

Also, I'm still wondering whether you have a problem with lesbians?
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
And there's a difference. Pedophilia is defined as a mental disease, not a born trait. Retardation is also a born trait, but it's apples and oranges compared to homosexuality.
These "definitions" are influenced politically and therefore are not relevant. Make no mistake. A homosexual and a pedophile are both trying to mate with an incapable partner.
Retardation is a born trait as you said homosexuality was a few posts ago.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
Correct. But there is the argument that these acts promote a stronger hetero mating ritual and therefore promote impregnation. The same cannot be said of homos.
That would be a pretty weak argument. The majority of hetero couples alive today are probably unable to conceive.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
Well, you don't object to two hetero people who can not physically reproduce, and you don't call it a crime, so why do you object homosexual behavior and call it a crime?

Also, I'm still wondering whether you have a problem with lesbians?
Again. Learn to read. Both of these points have been adressed directly.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
These "definitions" are influenced politically and therefore are not relevant. Make no mistake. A homosexual and a pedophile are both trying to mate with an incapable partner.
Retardation is a born trait as you said homosexuality was a few posts ago.
There is a huge difference between being unable to repoduce and unable/unwilling to give consent. And you're not that dumb that you cannot see that.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
That would be a pretty weak argument. The majority of hetero couples alive today are probably unable to conceive.
How is that?
If a couple makes a concsious decision to control impregnation, it does not affect their biological instinct to do so.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
There is a huge difference between being unable to repoduce and unable/unwilling to give consent. And you're not that dumb that you cannot see that.
The initial attraction is the key fluff. Pedophiles "love" their incapable partners just as gays do. This is why I referred to it as "victimless" earlier.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
How is that?
If a couple makes a concsious decision to control impregnation, it does not affect their biological instinct to do so.
After the menopause conscious decisions are not part of the process...
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
After the menopause conscious decisions are not part of the process...
The urge to mate continues after menopause. Biologically you're incapable just as someone who is sterile from birth, but the urge is still there.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
The initial attraction is the key fluff. Pedophiles "love" their incapable partners just as gays do. This is why I referred to it as "victimless" earlier.
The difference is that the law is there to protect people too young as to be able to make rational decisions. Once people are of a certain age they can give their consent with knowledge of what it entails.

It's not even close to the same thing.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
The urge to mate continues after menopause. Biologically you're incapable just as someone who is sterile from birth, but the urge is still there.
And gay people have an urge too, so your argument is groundless.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
The difference is that the law is there to protect people too young as to be able to make rational decisions. Once people are of a certain age they can give their consent with knowledge of what it entails.

It's not even close to the same thing.
In terms of law and morality you are correct. In terms of biology they are quite similar. You cannot deny that.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
And gay people have an urge too, so your argument is groundless.
You're missing the point. They have a misdirected urge. A flaw if you will in to what direction their urge pushes them.

EDIT: To expound.

Both have the same % of a chance of reproducing...which is what mating is designed for.
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
These "definitions" are influenced politically and therefore are not relevant. Make no mistake. A homosexual and a pedophile are both trying to mate with an incapable partner.
Retardation is a born trait as you said homosexuality was a few posts ago.
If a gene is found that makes a person a homosexual, and we can identify factors that make pedophilia a mental disease, then there is no political influence in the definitions. That's like saying evolution is politically defined to be science.

The problem with your retardation example is that the person is incapable of performing the job. That doesn't mean the person is being discriminated against. However, not giving a pilot's license to someone just because he prefers men is discrimination.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
You're missing the point. They have a misdirected urge. A flaw if you will in to what direction their urge pushes them.

EDIT: To expound.

Both have the same % of a chance of reproducing...which is what mating is designed for.
Do you only have sex to reproduce?
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Again. Learn to read. Both of these points have been adressed directly.
Not to my satisfaction.

You called it a crime, then compared it to pedophilia and necrophilia. Both of those comparisons are found wanting, since both of the examples are mental diseases, not born traits.

Also, you said you have no problem with anyone getting it on, but by calling it a crime, it seems you do. You've also made references that specifically mentioned gay men, but not women. Do you, or do you not have the same problem with gay men that you do with gay women?
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
In terms of law and morality you are correct. In terms of biology they are quite similar. You cannot deny that.
Eh, for example an adult male and a 13 year girl the same as two adult males? What planet are you on?
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
You're missing the point. They have a misdirected urge. A flaw if you will in to what direction their urge pushes them.

EDIT: To expound.

Both have the same % of a chance of reproducing...which is what mating is designed for.
Why misdirected? They are doing what comes natural. Hey, quit being the color that you are, it's misdirected.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
If a gene is found that makes a person a homosexual, and we can identify factors that make pedophilia a mental disease, then there is no political influence in the definitions. That's like saying evolution is politically defined to be science.
There is proof of evolution.

There is no proof of a gay gene (I do believe people are born that way in most cases, however) and there is no proof seperating it from pedophilia (which I also believe most people are born with)


The problem with your retardation example is that the person is incapable of performing the job. That doesn't mean the person is being discriminated against. However, not giving a pilot's license to someone just because he prefers men is discrimination.
You really can comprehend simple sh!t, can you? You said we dont discriminate, I said we do and gave examples. The example proves that we do, in fact, discriminate. You havent disproven that. You've just added that example to another part of a debate which isnt anywhere near where I put it. Please try to keep up.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
Why misdirected? They are doing what comes natural. Hey, quit being the color that you are, it's misdirected.
Its misdirected in that its not achieving its intended purpose. You really must have a simple mind.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
Not to my satisfaction.

You called it a crime, then compared it to pedophilia and necrophilia. Both of those comparisons are found wanting, since both of the examples are mental diseases, not born traits.

Also, you said you have no problem with anyone getting it on, but by calling it a crime, it seems you do. You've also made references that specifically mentioned gay men, but not women. Do you, or do you not have the same problem with gay men that you do with gay women?
Again. This has been adressed, directly. Each question. Please learn to read.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
Its misdirected in that its not achieving its intended purpose. You really must have a simple mind.
They are enjoying it which is their intended purpose.

What exactly is it that makes you think that sex is only about reproduction?
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
there is no proof seperating it from pedophilia (which I also believe most people are born with)
In exactly the same way that the is no proof separating pedophilia from heterosexual sex. Or from theft... What are you trying to say, there is no logic to your argument.
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
There is proof of evolution.
Exactly.
There is no proof of a gay gene (I do believe people are born that way in most cases, however) and there is no proof seperating it from pedophilia (which I also believe most people are born with)
The latest scientific findings are that people are born gay, but not born as pedophiles. That's why pedophilia is listed as a mental disease.
You really can comprehend simple sh!t, can you? You said we dont discriminate, I said we do and gave examples. The example proves that we do, in fact, discriminate. You havent disproven that. You've just added that example to another part of a debate which isnt anywhere near where I put it. Please try to keep up.
Personal attacks aside, you can equivocate on the definition of discrimination, but it makes your argument weak.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
fluff said:
They are enjoying it which is their intended purpose.

What exactly is it that makes you think that sex is only about reproduction?
Sex IS about reproduction. That is it. That it helps "BONDING" is only to enforce more reproduction. this is biology 101
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Its misdirected in that its not achieving its intended purpose. You really must have a simple mind.
Which purpose, procreation? Well, considering that has been answered (in that many people can not procreate) your argument here sucks too.
 

fluff

Monkey Turbo
Sep 8, 2001
5,673
2
Feeling the lag
BurlyShirley said:
Sex IS about reproduction. That is it. That it helps "BONDING" is only to enforce more reproduction. this is biology 101
Tell that to your next hooker, maybe she'll give you a discount if you bond well.

How does a one night stand fit in with your life vision?
 

Old Man G Funk

Choir Boy
Nov 21, 2005
2,864
0
In a handbasket
BurlyShirley said:
Again. This has been adressed, directly. Each question. Please learn to read.
No, it has not. What exactly about homosexuality constitutes a crime?

Do you or do you not have a difference of opinion when it comes to homosexual men vs. women?
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
The latest scientific findings are that people are born gay, but not born as pedophiles. That's why pedophilia is listed as a mental disease.
You make absolutely no sense. Why is it that you think people cannot be born without mental diseases? You simply dont have the slightest understanding of this topoc.


Personal attacks aside, you can equivocate on the definition of discrimination, but it makes your argument weak.
Again, you're so far off base its not even worth arguing over.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Old Man G Funk said:
No, it has not. What exactly about homosexuality constitutes a crime?

Do you or do you not have a difference of opinion when it comes to homosexual men vs. women?
This little side argument you're attempting to start isnt worth the time. I wont post it again, so you may as well quit asking.