wildcard winners:
Pats
Bengals
Panthers
Buccaneers
Pats
Bengals
Panthers
Buccaneers
NFL playoff prediction thread
- Thread starter narlus
- Start date
I concur.narlus said:
Pats
Steelers
Panthers
Bucs
Steelers
Panthers
Bucs
Washington over Tampa Bay
New England over Jacksonville
NY Giants over Carolina
Pittsburgh over Cincinnati
New England over Jacksonville
NY Giants over Carolina
Pittsburgh over Cincinnati
Skins over Bucs.
Jags over those assface Pats
Panthers beating Eli and the Giants
Cincy all over P-burgh.
Superbowl prediction: Seahawks and Colts (Although I'd like it to be Denver and Seattle).
Jags over those assface Pats
Panthers beating Eli and the Giants
Cincy all over P-burgh.
Superbowl prediction: Seahawks and Colts (Although I'd like it to be Denver and Seattle).
Steelers all the way
not with this douchebag on the sidelines:MancilG said:
ditto.robdamanii said:
I think the only way for Denver to make it to the SB is for whomever is playing the Colts to jump out to a substantial lead in the first quarter before they get a chance to get rolling in the Divisional Game. Then Denver would host the AFC champ game.
Can anyone in the NFC even compete with Seattle?
seattle had the easiest schedule by far of all playoff teams...we'll see how they fare playing tough teams back to back...
I predict 50% of the teams will win and 50% will lose........... 
IMO, the Bears can compete with them, andLordOpie said:
Carolina (depends on which team shows up) Panthers can compete with them. I say this because they are my home team, and I have seen them play all year, and they can be two different teams.
The team that demolishes (First Tampa game, and both Atlanta games) and the team that looks like it should be sponsored by Chico's Bail Bonds (the last Tampa game, which I was at.
)Plus, out of all the NFC teams, which one has done anything at all in the playoffs in the last couple of years. Only the Panthers, giving the Patriots the best game they could ever ask for in the Superbowl,
and people picked against them all through the playoffs that year too.
What's wrong with Bill Cowher?narlus said:not with this douchebag on the sidelines:
Oh yeah, as a Pats fan, you are sworn to hate him.
nah, plenty of steelers fans hate his guts too. he's awful.
giants....
Steve SmithJeremy R said:IMO, the Bears can compete with them, and
Carolina (depends on which team shows up) Panthers can compete with them. I say this because they are my home team, and I have seen them play all year, and they can be two different teams.
The team that demolishes (First Tampa game, and both Atlanta games) and the team that looks like it should be sponsored by Chico's Bail Bonds (the last Tampa game, which I was at.
Plus, out of all the NFC teams, which one has done anything at all in the playoffs in the last couple of years. Only the Panthers, giving the Patriots the best game they could ever ask for in the Superbowl,
and people picked against them all through the playoffs that year too.
The Giants should have beat them in Seattle if their FG kicker didn't CHOKE THREE TIMES.LordOpie said:
I really think any of the NFC teams can make it to the Super Bowl. Well, except Carolina.
has Feely been on the team the whole year, or is he a recent sign-ee because the kicking game was so awful?I Are Baboon said:
What was that score again? Oh that's right 27-17.I Are Baboon said:
He's been there all season.narlus said:
What score?DRB said:
*checks Carolina's schedule*
Are you referring to the week two win vs New England? That's all fine, but if you are trying to rub that in my face, I am not a Pats fan.
I predict that I won't watch any of the playoff games, and for the superbowl I'll end up at a cool party but won't watch the game.
The real football season ends tonight.
so is college baseball better than MLB?
Don't know, baseball is boring no matter who is playing. Furthermore my good man, your are trying to compare apples to oranges.narlus said:
are college cheerleaders better than pro cheerleaders?
or is that apples and melons?
or is that apples and melons?
steelers are hungry and being overlooked, they will overpower any team in the nfl right now, as long as they dont turn the ball over too much and lock the defense down against the pass.narlus said:not with this douchebag on the sidelines:
doesn't bode well then...Cincy led the NFL by far in the giveaway/takeaway stats...+25 compared to Pitt's +7manhattanprjkt83 said:
narlus said:
Yes. Yes. and Yes.narlus said:
Not even close.
Jeremy R said:
College ball sucks.
you are kidding right?narlus said:not with this douchebag on the sidelines:
Cincy doesn't have a great rush defense and Pittsburgh has been running for upwards of 200 yards a game the last 5-6 weeks. If Pittsburgh's got their running game going, Cincy's offense won't be on the field long enough to put that pass attack to work. Pittsburgh will pound away with their running game, and I don't know if Cincy is tough enough to be able to handle it. I think Pittsburgh can be dangerous in these playoffs.narlus said:
Cincy doesn't need much time to score.I Are Baboon said:
Pittsburgh is perpetually that "dangerous" team.
I'd like to see Pigeons, err I mean Seahawks v. Colts in the Superbowl - and since I'm from Seattle - Seahawks winning it all.
you think he's a great coach?ridetoofast said:
he needs a larger throat.
Thank You! That is what im trying to say, the Indy and Seatle glam is getting alot of attention right now and keeping Pittsburgh off the radar. They are a total in your face team that is real about how hard they have to play after the small loosing streak that almost kept them out of the playoffs.I Are Baboon said:
Go Steelers.
I second, the guy is incredible.narlus said:
and this guy will kill anyone, who is gonna argue with me on that.
And? For every two minute scoring drive they have, Pittsburgh will match it with an eight minute one.DRB said:
Yeah, because they are always in the playoffs. Playoff teams are usually considered dangerous.
I just think Pittsburgh is being overlooked.