Hows 'bout dat lesborgy? Did that keep you on the edge of your seat or ducked beneath it with only only one hand in view? :biggrin:
I had to build up the suspense.
I really enjoyed it, and as someone said earlier it has a lot of similar characteristics to Sin City. There were a few slow parts but as a whole I was kept on the edge of my seat. The battle scenes were nothing less than epic, and left me with some sort of sadistic grin every time somebody violently died. I found the surreal/fantastical filming style to be incredible and despite all the CGI it was very well done. It wasn't the type of CGI that tries to mimic reality but always had something distorted to it (primarily lighting and shades, REALLY cool) so it was amazing. Maybe it's the fact that I'm still in high school and have to analyze literature so much but I found myself analyzing the movie and found it to be quite allegorical of morality and things like that.
I like movies like this. If you're looking for a historical documentary that mystically portrays what happened to an acute accuracy, then don't see it. It captivated me for the length of its duration and I might end up going back to see it again.
Satisfied?
Go to theater.you lost me...
Cliff's Notes?
he sez it was "allegorical of morality and things like that" and did not "mystically" depict "an acute accuracy". basically, i'm not sure what he was sayin'you lost me...
Cliff's Notes?
FixedGo to theater.
Watch screen.
Look at boobs.
Look at fights.
Look at fights in slow mo.
Look at boobs in slow mo.
I had to build up the suspense.
I really enjoyed it, and as someone said earlier it has a lot of similar characteristics to Sin City. There were a few slow parts but as a whole I was kept on the edge of my seat. The battle scenes were nothing less than epic, and left me with some sort of sadistic grin every time somebody violently died. I found the surreal/fantastical filming style to be incredible and despite all the CGI it was very well done. It wasn't the type of CGI that tries to mimic reality but always had something distorted to it (primarily lighting and shades, REALLY cool) so it was amazing. Maybe it's the fact that I'm still in high school and have to analyze literature so much but I found myself analyzing the movie and found it to be quite allegorical of morality and things like that.
I like movies like this. If you're looking for a historical documentary that mystically portrays what happened to an acute accuracy, then don't see it. It captivated me for the length of its duration and I might end up going back to see it again.
Satisfied?
Haha, looks like I've got someone else on the same train of thought as I. The bet has changed with my friend: if more than half the movie is in slo-mo, my friend buys the beer.Fixed
Should we award him points for using myriad SAT words?Much better.
BTW, how come all high school students on the monkey can't type with your coherency?
We should. I couldn't tell you what "allegorical of morality" means.Should we award him points for using myriad SAT words?
I think Ohio hacked his account.Much better.
BTW, how come all high school students on the monkey can't type with your coherency?
...just saw it.
That movie fu@king ruled.
On his way to meet the Persians, King Leonidas runs into another greek general and his troops who have come to help:
Greek General to King Leonidas: "...you only have 300 soldiers with you?! This is madness! But I have 1,000..."
King Leonidas to Soldier #1: "You... what is your profession?"
Soldier #1: "I am a pottery maker"
King Leonidas to Soldier #2: "You... what is your profession?"
Soldier #2: "I am a blacksmith"
King Leonidas to Soldier #3: "And you... what is your profession?"
Soldier #3: "I am a carpenter"
King Leonidas to his Spartan troops: "SPARTANS, what is YOUR profession?!"
Spartans: "WAR, WAR, WAR!!!!"
King Leonidas to the Greek general: ".... you see - I HAVE brought more soldiers than you."
Give me a break. It is a mucking movie. I'm going to see it in the capitol of war protestors with a bunch of peaceniks who happen to like comic books.uh, i'm glad you all are liking it (and i'll probably see it later on tonight), but everyone please step back and see if you, too have a streak of military worshipping fascism within you before you beat your chests too much.
don't be like gwb.
...you're kidding right?uh, i'm glad you all are liking it (and i'll probably see it later on tonight), but everyone please step back and see if you, too have a streak of military worshipping fascism within you before you beat your chests too much.
don't be like gwb.
There was a NY Times article, which was posted on this thread, talking about the political ramifications; whether Leonidas or Xerxes represented Bush.no, people, i am not kidding. from what i've read in the reviews the movie lays it on pretty thick, and the studio and director are just sitting back smug over the hoopla.
answer this: do you or do you not think this movie glorifies war?...thus perpetuating the fascist conspiracy to turn us all into mindless chest-beating troglodytes!
You've found them out my friend.
Kudos.
O.K. - one at a time here:answer this: do you or do you not think this movie glorifies war?
/me has spent the last 4 weeks of his life dealing with burnt out, alcoholic, PTSDed relics at a VA hospital
So, this movie is based on a novel that was based on some acutal historical events and written by Frank Miller of Batman fame back in 98'... so I guess that means that Clinton getting BJ's under his desk inspired this movie?Mr. Snyder, who said he intended neither analogy when he set out to adapt the graphic novel created by Frank Miller with Lynn Varley in 1998, suddenly knew he had the contemporary version of a water-cooler movie on his hands. And it has turned out to be one that could be construed as a thinly veiled polemic against the Bush administration, or be seen by others as slyly supporting it.
Just for clarification - most movies are crap, not art.<snip>
Movies are art
True.Just for clarification - most movies are crap, not art.
my point is that portraying war as a video game/graphic novel, even if the protagonists die, conveniently leaves out the myriad ways war deforms people. (or maybe that was implied in the whole "there is no higher honor than to die in battle".)I look forward to seeing it. Yes, it glorifies war, that's what a majority of war movies do. But they also present the reality that in war, you can die.
Indeed.For a thread that stated out promising and NOT in the political forum, it sure reeks of vagisil now!
classy.For a thread that stated out promising and NOT in the political forum, it sure reeks of vagisil now!
it's a movie - it's art, storytelling, and entertainment all rolled into one.my point is that portraying war as a video game/graphic novel, even if the protagonists die, conveniently leaves out the myriad ways war deforms people. (or maybe that was implied in the whole "there is no higher honor than to die in battle".)
i'm not saying that this movie is, but is there ever a point where it ceases to be protected as "art" and instead is propaganda?it's a movie - it's art, storytelling, and entertainment all rolled into one.
It's not an episode of Dr. Phil, O.K.?
Have you come to expect anything less?classy.
Some people just can't help themselves.For a thread that stated out promising and NOT in the political forum, it sure reeks of vagisil now!
........And don't mistake this for an Ann Coulter thing, but I'll say that after spending two hours watching dudes in Speedos with six-pack abs and red capes piercing everything they can with long spears, I needed to watch a Chippendale video just to wind down.
I really wanted to stab someone after the movie -- and yet I felt so confused by it.