As i see it now those are the three nicest forks on the market. Does anyone have complaints or good things to say about any of them because im looking into a new fork and all the imput helps
If that's true you shouldn't be seeking better equipment and just ride your bike.degoose said:The funney thing is that the only race you have ever competed in is the Ellings Park race
Adam Novatt said:888rcsx, i own i fox, I believe that they fell better but do not hold up to as much abuse as marzocchi. 888 are nice and will look a lot better on your stinky,escpecially because in jan they will come in white. PLus TREEEEEEEEVOOOOOOOOOr Carlin used it awh.
dexter said:i love how people call the new travis a "huge fork" the atoc is wayy lower than what is posted on the manitou site
For some reason I always found the rc2x attracive. Now I know whyvitox said:i put a travestite and a rc2x equipped bikes beside each other and they looked similar
I've had a few Boxxers now. I was on the fence between the Fox and the Boxxer also. The things that I considered and steered my decision were the following:S.K.C. said:...I've been boned by Boxxers too many times to feel comfortable with them at this point. I read Pterodactyl's review of them earlier in this thread, and from what he has said about his experience with them - the 06 WC sounds like it is a great fork.
The one thing I question about Boxxers, is their reliablity, and quality. When it comes to Boxxer production, QC (Quality Control) at RS has been very inconsistant. The top crown on my last Boxxer had gouges on the inside of the surface that slides down over the steerer. I doubt you'd find that problem on a Marz or a Fox.
This was of course an 04' fork, (COMPLETELY different from all the 06' models) so hopefully SRAM's acquisition of RS has improved their product. Only time will tell if the new SpeedStack and other new internals will have good QC and hold up over time.