Watch Erzberg, then rethink that statement. This stuff scares the sh*t of of me just watching it.
I'd be really impressed if you can get a moto down a lot of the stuff on the triple side.
Watch Erzberg, then rethink that statement. This stuff scares the sh*t of of me just watching it.
I'd be really impressed if you can get a moto down a lot of the stuff on the triple side.
Does your riding always look like the Special Olympics?Makes any DH riding I've ever done look like the special olympics.
You have NO idea..Does your riding always look like the Special Olympics?
That video just solidifies that Gee would crush Knight down Platty.Watch Erzberg, then rethink that statement. This stuff scares the sh*t of of me just watching it.Then remember that they're doing this for something crazy like 3-5 hours straight. Makes any DH riding I've ever done look like the special olympics.
ok thats great but they arent racing at Platty and no **** a DH bike would be faster then a moto in tight woods. And for the record they are racing FORT BILL! NOT PLATTY.That video just solidifies that Gee would crush Knight down Platty.
Does this answer your questions?Does your riding always look like the Special Olympics?
No no, I agree with you. It's just that those guys who talk sh!t are going to use this as ammo as the game has been obviously handicapped in favor of DH.Well come on, let's be realistic here. It's not like anybody has any doubts about which is faster in the wide open. They're trying to make it interesting. And perhaps show that in certain terrains, a non-powered vehicle might actually be faster and than a powered vehicle.
Of course it's stupid, I just see it as ammo to all the guys at work that say I'm a wimp for riding a bicycle rather than a moto.
Hey what color is that dirt??Does this answer your questions?
I doubt that. I'd go with a 450 4-stroke, simply because the compression braking of the 4-stroke is very useful in the steeps, and the lug of the four would really help when getting the front up off tight, tech drops. You'd have to focus too much on braking and staying in the powerband on the 2stroke thru tech sections for it to be all that potent.knight easily winning. 250 2-stroke is my guess for which bike he would be fastest on.
Dunno, blacked out for 1/2 second on impact and got a mild concussion (my first and only so far) :'(Hey what color is that dirt??
Not to be argumentative, but have you ever ridden a 450 in tight stuff? I have a '08 KTM 450SXF and race MX and hare scrambles quite a bit. My 450 is slower in tight stuff than the 250 2t and 300 2t bikes that I have ridden. Sure, the 450 blows everything else out of the water if it's a little bit open. The problem is that you can't throw the 450 side to side very fast compared to a 250 2t.I doubt that. I'd go with a 450 4-stroke, simply because the compression braking of the 4-stroke is very useful in the steeps, and the lug of the four would really help when getting the front up off tight, tech drops. You'd have to focus too much on braking and staying in the powerband on the 2stroke thru tech sections for it to be all that potent.
In fact, I'd think most good riders would be faster on a full-on enduro than even the 450 class MX bike because of the enduro's forgiveness and low-end.
Knighter always rides the 300 XC (tighter gearbox) when he rides a 2T.Not to be argumentative, but have you ever ridden a 450 in tight stuff? I have a '08 KTM 450SXF and race MX and hare scrambles quite a bit. My 450 is slower in tight stuff than the 250 2t and 300 2t bikes that I have ridden. Sure, the 450 blows everything else out of the water if it's a little bit open. The problem is that you can't throw the 450 side to side very fast compared to a 250 2t.
Again, I love my 450. It is faster almost anywhere. But I think you will see knight on a 250 unless KTM tells him to ride a 450.
Not to be argumentative, but have you ever ridden a 450 in tight stuff? I have a '08 KTM 450SXF and race MX and hare scrambles quite a bit. My 450 is slower in tight stuff than the 250 2t and 300 2t bikes that I have ridden. Sure, the 450 blows everything else out of the water if it's a little bit open. The problem is that you can't throw the 450 side to side very fast compared to a 250 2t.
Again, I love my 450. It is faster almost anywhere. But I think you will see knight on a 250 unless KTM tells him to ride a 450.
The SINGLE clip I saw in there of riders going down a hill rather than up it made them look like total punters. That sort of terrain is where bikes will absolutely tear motos apart.Watch Erzberg, then rethink that statement. This stuff scares the sh*t of of me just watching it.Then remember that they're doing this for something crazy like 3-5 hours straight. Makes any DH riding I've ever done look like the special olympics.
It's close. At least compared to a lot of tracks.Unless Ft Bill is a total freeway...
you make a valid point in that Knight is 6'4" and can handle a bigger thumper easier than most, that doesnt mean conceptually a 450f is best suited for the course, he may ride one cause he is used to it and cant be arsed to change.Yeah, quite a bit actually, and I've spent quite a bit more time on a 2stroke 250. Almost all of my riding is done in the woods in western washington. Tight, steep, wet. I'd take the low end power over the lighter/lower weight any day. I can see for a smaller/lighter rider where that may not be the case, but I'm a fairly big guy, and I know that while I have quite a few pounds on Knight, he's a hell of a lot scrappier and more fit than I am, so he prob can handle the taller, heavier bike fine as well.
Most of the riders in that race are just trying to finish and ride REAL conservatively. They try to finish within the 6 hour time limit. Knighter usually finishes around an hour and a half.The SINGLE clip I saw in there of riders going down a hill rather than up it made them look like total punters. That sort of terrain is where bikes will absolutely tear motos apart.
Quick acceleration's all well and good, but he's going to lose a lot in not carrying as much speed through tech sections as Gee can on a more precise more nimble machine. And he knows it - Knight himself is saying he thinks it'll be close, and I'm sure he's well aware of his 50 ponies he has to help him out!I just watched Gee's 2010 Ft William run again, and I couldn't help but think that every time he turns a pedal, Knight will be tapping 50 (that's fifty) horsepower. Although a 2 stroke makes more sense, I hope Knighter rides the big 530, which is what he won this years World Enduro Championship on and also what I ride, haha.
I do think this race is pretty silly - both guys are incredible athletes and both sports are super cool - isn't that enough? But the speculation is fun I guess. Hopefully we'll see some clean seamless footage and they won't make too much of a production out of it.
Indeed.
Here's a similar take
fixed that for yaLooking at it mathematicly. What percentage of track will the moto have an advantage? What percentage of time will he advance? Compare this to what percentage the pushie will have the advantage? and what percent faster it will be there.
80% faster for 10% track compared to 20% faster for 90% of track isn't going to win(this is an exagerated hypperthetical to show my point).
Can someone with no life, watch a timed run of the track, and calculate where a moto could outperform, and by how much.
good find, I bet you Knight is reading all of our posts...http://www.redbull.com/cs/Satellite/en_INT/Article/Knight-delighted-at-hat-trick-of-titles-021242915714151?refmod=ContentFeed&refmodpos=A13
Words from the man himself about half way down the page!
yeah, nah.good find, I bet you Knight is reading all of our posts...
Nah, he's doing the calcs for NSM lolgood find, I bet you Knight is reading all of our posts...