I'm gonna get one, a light sleeping bag would be fine in there.Stupid place for a bag in my experience. Maybe a tiny bag with a tool in it, but that weight is in the worst possible place. On some of the gravel/touring stuff it blows my mind they are choosing those over micro paniers.
I road one for a day and liked it. Pedaled well, very maneuverable. Handled some abuse well. I liked the GG Pistola a little bit more.Any of you have much time on a Kona Process 134? Curious about impressions as a trail bike. I could actually get one within a year, I think.
I usually try to run 3 or 4 calculators and see which ones agree and then try to figure out why or why one is showing something different. I've also realized rounding up is better and sometimes the listed "ideal" spoke length will sell you short, as in it's telling you if 247.3 is actual and 247 is "best"...it's not, 248 is "best" in that case to avoid coming up short. It's a bit frustrating figuring it all out usually to make sure, I usually write it down somewhere so I have my specs saved for each wheel I build.I hate not having the right spoke length..
Went off qbp calculator and they are at least 2 to 3 mm to short.
2 cross
King gen 2 iso dh hub 12x150
Diameter 57.4
Left offset 38.5
Right offset 25
Dt swiss 26" fr570 ERD 535 32 hole
This is the lengths
left side 249.6 (249)
Right side 248.17 (248)
248 is about 2 mm to short. all the first row to left go in then you twist hub for 2 cross and it's 1.5 mm to short of threads going in hole...
They do look pretty nice, are there supply issues? They seem to be fairly easy to get in Aus.Any of you have much time on a Kona Process 134? Curious about impressions as a trail bike. I could actually get one within a year, I think.
Yeah I've had pretty good luck with thr qbp calculator, I think the error is on the Chris king side....I usually try to run 3 or 4 calculators and see which ones agree and then try to figure out why or why one is showing something different. I've also realized rounding up is better and sometimes the listed "ideal" spoke length will sell you short, as in it's telling you if 247.3 is actual and 247 is "best"...it's not, 248 is "best" in that case to avoid coming up short. It's a bit frustrating figuring it all out usually to make sure, I usually write it down somewhere so I have my specs saved for each wheel I build.
Or get one of those. In case they are too long you can cut them.Yeah I've had pretty good luck with thr qbp calculator, I think the error is on the Chris king side....
Yeah so I have to get different spokes tomorrow...I'll take hub and shoe him the fitment and also the numbers so he can plug them in...
I'll just build it Sunday when wife's st work.
Did you measure to make sure those numbers for your hub are correct? You might be able to make spokes that are 2mm too short work. If not, at least you know what size you need now. Every wheel builder has been there.I hate not having the right spoke length..
Went off qbp calculator and they are at least 2 to 3 mm to short.
2 cross
King gen 2 iso dh hub 12x150
Diameter 57.4
Left offset 38.5
Right offset 25
Dt swiss 26" fr570 ERD 535 32 hole
This is the lengths
left side 249.6 (249)
Right side 248.17 (248)
248 is about 2 mm to short. all the first row to left go in then you twist hub for 2 cross and it's 1.5 mm to short of threads going in hole...
No bueno. If a spoke does not thread through the head of a nipple, the nipple will break.There’s always 16mm spoke nipples if you get in a pinch.
They are too tight even with hub flange centered no off set they won't start the 2 cross that's where it's 2mm or so too short to engage in nipples.Did you measure to make sure those numbers for your hub are correct? You might be able to make spokes that are 2mm too short work. If not, at least you know what size you need now. Every wheel builder has been there.
Correct you want it into the head, through the rim wall for supportNo bueno. If a spoke does not thread through the head of a nipple, the nipple will break.
Sounds like they are off by more than 2mm, perhaps even 4-5?They won't even hit the rim wall let alone the head...
Yeah, I've had ones that were a little short on the engagement, re-lace with 14 or 16 brass and they are solid thereafter. I have so damn many lying around from spokes I've bought in the past where the online shop or whatever took out the "nice" nipples and put in these crap heavy brass ones...but I guess the joke is on them in the end, since they are proving useful. IME, eventually the galvanization catches up with carbon rims and alloy nipples, despite prep and anno, it just takes at least a few years/seasons. Not bad to build with alloy knowing this, but these brass make perfect replacements down the road if you want to go that route. Especially when your thread engagement was not "optimal". Obviously it could be so far that it's not even sufficient for this, but I echo what rideit experiences.Correct. That said, I have built over 700 wheels, and I have done this ‘in a pinch’, even with alloy nipples, on wheels that lasted four 4 or five years. So it’s not as catastrophic of a solution as you might think. But, not DH wheels, so there is that.
No I 3x....I was going to build a lighter setup and decided I need to quit chasing the great white rhino and just ride...so went 3x...@bullcrew Y U NO 3-cross????
the featherweight plowmaster who always builds 3x and never destroys wheels is pleased with your response.No I 3x....I was going to build a lighter setup and decided I need to quit chasing the great white rhino and just ride...so went 3x...
Lmfao...the featherweight plowmaster who always builds 3x and never destroys wheels is pleased with your response.
View attachment 164508
Interested to hear your thoughts on the fork.A friend hooked up a yellow shock, so I grabbed the matching swedish meatball fork.
27.5 rear wheel finished, and some real tires. The DH slush fund is officially empty...
Geo currently 62.5 HA, 345mm BB height, 443mm chainstay, with 46mm offset crowns on the Ohlins (from 59mm with the stock Boxxer).
Was hoping to ride the lift today, but the wife got called in so maybe next weekend. Shreds in the yard though!
View attachment 164507
Lmao...I can say not gonna happenNow you will die mullet
The new boxxer is a great fork...I should have kept mine. Should have messed with it a bit tune wise...light and stiff...Thanks to @Redwood Mulch Chucker 's upgrade to some black gold I was able to get my hands on a like new takeoff 29er Boxxer RC for my Nukeproof Mega 290 project. Downhill F'n rules and the dependable steed is now effectively a downhill bike that can be pedalled with the fork and long shocking. Can't wait to get her to the lift. The increase in front end stiffness that can felt just hopping on the bike is exactly what I was looking for. It's amazing how much of a noodle a single crown is between the fork and stem/steerer flex.
View attachment 164677
Fingers crossed that the ol head tube doesn't rip off....
Yea, gotta play round with it some and get it to some proper trails to get things dialed. Started with the settings that were listed out by that Griz fella over at Vital that was listed in the new Session review. Running a far higher psi than RS recommended is the way to go apparently with all the Debonair forks. RS listed 118 for my weight, but 135 actually provides spring support. Just sitting on the thing at 118 felt completely wrong.The new boxxer is a great fork...I should have kept mine. Should have messed with it a bit tune wise...light and stiff...
Love the looks of it and the debonair is nice...
Bike looks kick @$$....congrats
Yeah I was over what they recommended for sure, doesn't bother me. Their recommendations are to give me a starting point and go from there...never put alot of trust in those being end all...just a good starting point ...however my issue has been mid travel support on alot of forks...the boxxer was pretty consistent through the mid stroke which was great. But I wanted a change to try something different and I think I pulled the trigger a bit too fast ..Yea, gotta play round with it some and get it to some proper trails to get things dialed. Started with the settings that were listed out by that Griz fella over at Vital that was listed in the new Session review. Running a far higher psi than RS recommended is the way to go apparently with all the Debonair forks. RS listed 118 for my weight, but 135 actually provides spring support. Just sitting on the thing at 118 felt completely wrong.
Lmao...so random...made me laugh again so had to give you props for quick witt....Now you will die mullet
Prime or Titan?It's progress. Should have some energy to finish putting it together in the next week or two.
View attachment 164787