Quantcast

Random new bike thread

bullcrew

3 Dude Approved
He applied already and they are between travel and it changes wheel path as well..bottom hole requires no idler so it goes off to another hole to get bolted down

Middle hole it goes back on and uses CBF and I track, then top hole mimicks like a Jedi wheel path....

He's been running it before lapierre by well over a year or 2....
I think it's a great idea, I like the idea of having one bike that does well in other areas . Ride with wife and keep it on bottom hole and pedal ..don't think I'd use middle im all about "I paid for it, I want it!" So it would be too hole ...
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,095
829
2 pivot locations, 4mm difference in travel.

the vampire can be run with 165, 190, or 220 mm of travel in each of its 3 pivot locations.
This reminds me of my Giant F-pos. It had 3 adjustments in the back 4,5 and 6" of travel. Though I didn't waste my time reading about the Vampire, it seems as impractical unless if the shock has some sort of stroke adjustment. With the F-pos, when you adjusted the travel the stroke lenght stayed the same increasing the leverage. You either had a 4" bike with some sag and the rest of the stroke was firm compression. Or 6" with 3" of sag and firm compression. I know 2 different generations/tech/qualities, but there's definitely some sacrifices to the quality of that suspension. Right? Anyone have experience with a modern travel adjustable bike?
 

slimshady

¡Mira, una ardilla!
This reminds me of my Giant F-pos. It had 3 adjustments in the back 4,5 and 6" of travel. Though I didn't waste my time reading about the Vampire, it seems as impractical unless if the shock has some sort of stroke adjustment. With the F-pos, when you adjusted the travel the stroke lenght stayed the same increasing the leverage. You either had a 4" bike with some sag and the rest of the stroke was firm compression. Or 6" with 3" of sag and firm compression. I know 2 different generations/tech/qualities, but there's definitely some sacrifices to the quality of that suspension. Right? Anyone have experience with a modern travel adjustable bike?
Well, Canyon's ShapeShifter worked pretty well, in terms of making a long travel bike pedalable. It changed the leverage ratio and straightened both the HT and ST angles.
 

jstuhlman

bagpipe wanker
Dec 3, 2009
17,540
14,534
Cackalacka du Nord
This reminds me of my Giant F-pos. It had 3 adjustments in the back 4,5 and 6" of travel. Though I didn't waste my time reading about the Vampire, it seems as impractical unless if the shock has some sort of stroke adjustment. With the F-pos, when you adjusted the travel the stroke lenght stayed the same increasing the leverage. You either had a 4" bike with some sag and the rest of the stroke was firm compression. Or 6" with 3" of sag and firm compression. I know 2 different generations/tech/qualities, but there's definitely some sacrifices to the quality of that suspension. Right? Anyone have experience with a modern travel adjustable bike?
not modern, but i liked the combo of two shock positions and the adjustable g3 dropouts on my old intense uzzi and did occasionally change the settings depending on where i was riding.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
8,875
SADL
Had a Carbine that had ajustable travel. 140-150mm. Ran it with the air shock at 140 and I was using an Elka coil for 150. Also had a Lyrik coil U-Turn that went from 140 to 160 (or was it 130-150?) Anyway, sub 30lbs bike that was a hoot back then. Until I destroyed it of course, cough* cough* Intense
 
Last edited:

toodles

ridiculously corgi proportioned
Aug 24, 2004
5,966
5,396
Australia
Also had a Lyrik coil U-Turn that went from 140 to 160 (or was it 130-150?)
I've got one of those on my pub bike. I think mine is 110-160mm or something. I'll check. Its 26" and straight steerer haha - I'm stuffed finding a replacement if I ever need one.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
8,875
SADL
I've got one of those on my pub bike. I think mine is 110-160mm or something. I'll check. Its 26" and straight steerer haha - I'm stuffed finding a replacement if I ever need one.
I think that was it. Didn't remember they had such a range.
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,647
11,153
AK
I think that was it. Didn't remember they had such a range.
Because 26”ers with no AS lifting their front wheel like the space shuttle taking off at the slightest climb grade. Shit was real once you went past 4” of travel.
 

dump

Turbo Monkey
Oct 12, 2001
8,619
5,479
Because 26”ers with no AS lifting their front wheel like the space shuttle taking off at the slightest climb grade. Shit was real once you went past 4” of travel.
I still have a sektor coil, 120-150mm uturn, straight 1 1/8th. Solid, simple fork.
 

FlipSide

Turbo Monkey
Sep 24, 2001
1,468
940
I still have a Revelation UTurn Coil 426 from 2008 in the parts bin. I believe it was adjustable between 85 and 125 (130?)mm. Apart for the QR dropouts, that was quite a good fork. The UTurn system has always worked perfectly well.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,679
22,788
Sleazattle
I still have a Revelation UTurn Coil 426 from 2008 in the parts bin. I believe it was adjustable between 85 and 125 (130?)mm. Apart for the QR dropouts, that was quite a good fork. The UTurn system has always worked perfectly well.

I kind of miss my old TALAS.

Modern long travel forks work better over a larger range of conditions but it was really nice to be able to quickly adjust geometry for different trails.
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,095
829
I kind of miss my old TALAS.

Modern long travel forks work better over a larger range of conditions but it was really nice to be able to quickly adjust geometry for different trails.
The Talas nailed it as where the u-turn sucked.
The Talas would adjust the travel, but keep the (relative) sag and feel consistent.

The u-turn on my Psylo was shit.
At 3" you had 1" of sag and 2" of rock hard suspension. At 5" it gave you 3" of sag and 2" of rock hard suspension.
 

Jozz

Joe Dalton
Apr 18, 2002
6,836
8,875
SADL
The Talas nailed it as where the u-turn sucked.
The Talas would adjust the travel, but keep the (relative) sag and feel consistent.

The u-turn on my Psylo was shit.
At 3" you had 1" of sag and 2" of rock hard suspension. At 5" it gave you 3" of sag and 2" of rock hard suspension.
I had a completely different experience with my Lyrik coil. 140 was indeed a tad stiffer, which was perfect for trailbike duty. And crazy plush at 160 when I was running the rear coil. Never cranked it down into the extreme.
 

Gary

my pronouns are hag/gis
Aug 27, 2002
8,751
6,712
UK
Lyrik coil was later though.
The pike u turn coils got it right.
Psylo was basically a judy with longer stanchions and whatever shit was lying around for internals.

Cool name tho... If you played Halo
 
Last edited:

jonKranked

Detective Dookie
Nov 10, 2005
89,780
27,934
media blackout
There's a guy in Vital saying they have not enough of a big market to keep the additive, substractive and gearbox versions of the DH bike.


DUDE, THEY ARE PRINTING/MACHINING EACH BIKE ON ORDER, THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS STOCK!!!!
Those were my thoughts as well. Bikes are made to order, and it's a company founded by downhillers. What else would one expect?
 

Happymtb.fr

Turbo Monkey
Feb 9, 2016
2,111
1,489
SWE
To the very people dumbass Brexit voters hate?
You mean those frightened elderly people? They are not much into downhill, are they?

I was thinking about people outside UK, for example the good people living within the EU. After import fee and VAT the price goes upp by roughly 25% for them
 

Gary

my pronouns are hag/gis
Aug 27, 2002
8,751
6,712
UK
Sadly. Not all are elderly. Or frightened. Just cunts!

The tax thing is fucked. But works both ways. Ie. We're double fucked.

Queue the smug Swiss dwelling German