i average 14 in the city
No one gives a f uck what you average, it all depends on what uncle Sam says you average
i average 14 in the city
I guess Obama himself wrote this piece of legislation and then it got through and senate with no major alterations. He alone is responsible for it's content.Come up with something better Obama!
That's because YOU DRIVE LIKE A COP! My wife can somehow manage to get 10mpg in my truck when I was out of town and yet I get 18mpg on average.i average 14 in the city
haha..not in my van i don't. i'm so afraid to get on the gas in that american pos that i drive it like ms. daisy's in the back. in the past 2 years i have changed out both O2 sensors, 2 batteries, 2 alternators, piston coil, brake rotors with less than 20k miles, 2 sets of wheel bearings (and a 3rd that i have to do soon)That's because YOU DRIVE LIKE A COP! My wife can somehow manage to get 10mpg in my truck when I was out of town and yet I get 18mpg on average.
Yeah - but putting 3 kids in one of those is a PITA. Unlike the van.<snip> it's 15 years old, has zero problems and runs circles around my van in handling, performance, and gas mileage.
1. The voucher replaces the trade-in deal you might otherwise get from the dealership; it’s not in addition to the car’s private sale or trade-in value. In other words, if you’re trading in a car that’s worth $3000, your net gain is only $500. Although if your car is worth $100, CFC couldn’t come at a better time.
2. We’re not sure how many folks driving cars worth $3500 or less are in the market for a new car in the first place. Sure, there’s the occasional fresh-out-of-college new-hire (we’re not sure who’s hiring right now, but we’ll play make-believe) that might still be ready to move from a Dodge Omni to a shiny new Honda Insight, but people driving cheap old beaters are probably doing so because they can’t afford a new car. And $3500 doesn’t go far when the average transaction price of new cars hovers around $24K. The vouchers don’t apply toward the purchase of used cars, for which the majority of old beaters are traded in.
3. People driving large, gas-gulping old cars and trucks often do so because they need the utility those vehicles provide. Old station wagons, for example, have few modern counterparts that are as versatile while achieving better fuel economy. Ditto pickups, which have gotten bigger and more capable but not much more fuel-efficient. And if the government thinks that someone is going to step out of a 1994 Dodge Ram into a Honda Fit, they need to get out of D.C. a little more often.
4. Naturally, we have some reservations about any bill designed to facilitate wiping out—we’re sorry, recycling—any automotive species. And let’s face it, while there are a lot of bona fide clunkers out there, we’re afraid that a bunch of future classics will get caught in this roundup. We propose, then, that a certified auto enthusiast (paid, of course) be placed at all certified CFC dealerships to screen the cars that are brought in, returning the cool cars—including anything with T-tops—to the streets.
5. Besides cleansing the U.S. of gas-guzzling pigs, the other supposed benefit of the CFC program is to provide a short-term boost to the starving auto business. However, we hope these legislators don’t expect it to meaningfully help the domestic automakers. Many of the automobiles with fuel-economy ratings high enough to qualify for the vouchers come from Japan and Korea.
I forgot that sarcasm and the internet don't work togetherI guess Obama himself wrote this piece of legislation and then it got through and senate with no major alterations. He alone is responsible for it's content.
Lets not make the perfect the enemy of the good.Top 5 reasons CFC might be teh failboat (most have been covered here):
1mpg away and you 100% fail like this silly programThe only part that worries me is that she technically has a combined EPA of 19MPG (18/22), but that's by the old standard. I would be really really shocked if my 22 year old SUV did not qualify for this program because it's not "under 18MPG."
Really? You apparently don't have a healthy enough scorn for government stupidity.<snip>
The only part that worries me is that she technically has a combined EPA of 19MPG (18/22), but that's by the old standard. I would be really really shocked if my 22 year old SUV did not qualify for this program because it's not "under 18MPG."
I'd recommend driving your Toyota for another 100K miles.edit: I should add, I'm having the darndest time finding a new vehicle I actually want. Even the little Subies get **** for mileage. Toyota doesn't make a compact pickup or off-roadable SUV anymore. The Matrix AWD doesn't come in a 5-spd. Honda and Scion don't have anything with AWD. Christ, no wonder all these companies are tanking. They're not serving me.
Yeah, I already used that lookup. The final policy hasn't been decided. It's up to the NHTSA to execute the policy, so the "18MPG or less" is a guideline for them. We have to wait to see how they institute it.1mpg away and you 100% fail like this silly program
All vehicles MUST get 18mpg or less
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/sbs.htm
I'll wander as far as my unhealthy enthusiasm will take me...Really? You apparently don't have a healthy enough scorn for government stupidity.
I'd recommend driving your Toyota for another 100K miles.
I will be trading in my '87 4runner under this program. If this program did not exist, I would drive it for another 100k miles. It makes me a little sad, because I do consider the gen 1 4runners classics, but though mine started out straight and beautiful, it is now dented, scratched, cracked, and leaky. This is too much money to pass up, and it is better to get the thing off the road.
The only part that worries me is that she technically has a combined EPA of 19MPG (18/22), but that's by the old standard. I would be really really shocked if my 22 year old SUV did not qualify for this program because it's not "under 18MPG."
edit: I should add, I'm having the darndest time finding a new vehicle I actually want. Even the little Subies get **** for mileage. Toyota doesn't make a compact pickup or off-roadable SUV anymore. The Matrix AWD doesn't come in a 5-spd. Honda and Scion don't have anything with AWD. Christ, no wonder all these companies are tanking. They're not serving me.
Mr. Positive to the rescue.$10 says that Subaru isn't available until after this stupid program is over.
AND I hope Sub has done some major re-engineering of their head gaskets.
Since 05' and up, the head gaskets are great. The other stuff, like the strange and dangerous handling on ice, ultra-un-damp suspension and questionable AC system are a consideration towards Toyota and the like.$10 says that Subaru isn't available until after this stupid program is over.
AND I hope Sub has done some major re-engineering of their head gaskets.
I'd love it, but even if it makes it here, the diesel won't be avail in Cali. Sucks. I'd love a diesel. If I could swap one into my runner for less than $3k, that'd be bonerriffic.Diesel Subaru! 40 mpg and AWD / Turbo'ed.
What about restoring your old Toy, it is the ultimate version of recycling? For a while, I was restoring an 88, only with one ton chevy axles and 40" tires, strictly an offroader. Then, I got smart and have recently sold most of the stuff and I am just sticking to bikes and skiing.I'd love it, but even if it makes it here, the diesel won't be avail in Cali. Sucks. I'd love a diesel. If I could swap one into my runner for less than $3k, that'd be bonerriffic.
The soul and cube are cool, but I live in the middle of a city and have a motorcycle, so if it's just for transportation I'm already covered. I need the vehicle to be able to haul bikes, and lumber at a minimum. Getting me up to Tahoe in the snow is pretty important. Accessing trails is a nice-to-have. My current truck does all of that. Maybe I'm talking myself into passing up the rebate, but only for lack of selection.
Sounds like the most sensible thing to do.<snip> My current truck does all of that. Maybe I'm talking myself into passing up the rebate
Been down that road, and I unfortunately don't have the garage space I used to. Besides:What about restoring your old Toy, it is the ultimate version of recycling?
Arrrrgh....Toshi, you beat me to the punch on that one. I was driving in this morning, and heard that on the radio. The first thing I thought was, "Toshi is going to be ALL over this one."cash for clunkers is so dumb that 250,000 people took advantage of it, thus using up its allotted funds in a snap.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/31/business/31clunkers.html?hp
It's not a shock, really.cash for clunkers is so dumb that 250,000 people took advantage of it, thus using up its allotted funds in a snap.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/31/business/31clunkers.html?hp
I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. A family buys a Suburban in 1990-when gas prices were just over a dollar, and that's somehow a poor vehicle purchase decision?It's not a shock, really.
Dumb government program seeks to give away nearly $5000 to people who made poor vehicle purchase decisions and now have worthless pieces of $hit sitting in their driveway... and people are LINING UP to wallow at the trough.
Makes sense to me.
Yeah. Do you recall the 70's oil embargo?I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. A family buys a Suburban in 1990-when gas prices were just over a dollar, and that's somehow a poor vehicle purchase decision?