foreign auto makers seem to have no issue Stateside. they seem to be doing better than the big 3 who are unionYou do understand the problem with letting capital organize and not labor right?
and dante....really??
foreign auto makers seem to have no issue Stateside. they seem to be doing better than the big 3 who are unionYou do understand the problem with letting capital organize and not labor right?
Oh please, you really can't accept the occasional red square every once in a LOOOOOOONG time?? I said I'd cancel it out at some point in the future, jeez, what more do you want? Here, maybe this will help you feel better till then.foreign auto makers seem to have no issue Stateside. they seem to be doing better than the big 3 who are union
and dante....really??
Pocan says Walker's calculation of the state's budget problem is skewed by the fact that a significant portion of the gap in the next biennium is driven by agency budget requests, which always come in higher than what the actual funding turns out to be.
For example, in 2009-2011, agencies requested a 9.7 percent increase in general purpose revenue dollars, but were actually given a 2.6 percent reduction. That amounted to a $3.5 billion difference between the budget request and actual spending, although $1.3 billion of that reduction was due to the federal stimulus money.
it wasnt so much about the red square really, but can no one have a stance/opinion against a union?Oh please, you really can't accept the occasional red square every once in a LOOOOOOONG time?? I said I'd cancel it out at some point in the future, jeez, what more do you want? Here, maybe this will help you feel better till then.
that irked me the most. they had to have the police try and find the Dems. they obviously know they were going to lose, but why not still vote against it like the people want?The Democrats that ran away to a Best Western made themselves look like 3 year olds who are pitching a hissy fit and avoiding a vote they knew they were going to lose.
Technically, the negotiations go on between the municipalities and the employees. So if my community wants to vote teachers a pay raise, we do so. If my community wants to pay 100% of the teacher's health care costs, we can do so, for now. This bill PROHIBITS communities from opting to spend more than 88% of a public employee's health care costs. Doesn't matter if that's what we want, we would be prohibited from doing so thanks to state intervention.The Governor and the Rep majority legislature shouldn't have the ability or will to simply try to end collective bargaining in one fell swoop. That makes them appear as union busting capitalist. If you need to raise public workers, specifically teachers in this case, contributions to health and pension benefits, then negotiate.
They're blocking a vote in a legal manner, just like the filibustering that's been going on in the US Senate for the past 2 years. Don't like it? Eliminate the rule that you need 20 out of 33 senators present in order to hold a vote. It's there to protect the minority from the majority.X3pilot said:The Republican Governor and the legislature were voted in by election. The Democrats that ran away to a Best Western made themselves look like 3 year olds who are pitching a hissy fit and avoiding a vote they knew they were going to lose.
Without an actual filibuster rule (like the US Senate has), this is the only way to force a negotiation/compromise. Walker has acted like a megalomaniac before (he claimed his county had a "fiscal emergency" so he could circumvent his council and have the ability to fire security workers at will last year... too bad a court disagreed and socked his prior constituents with the $1m+ tab), and has refused to accept *any* changes to the non-budgetary parts of the bill.X3pilot said:Solutions? In a perfect world, they'd behave like adults and sit down and debate, negotiate and compromise.
That's one.fixed
Toyota, Honda, Nissa, BMW, MB, VW all are union free Stateside with the first two dominating the US market. 30% of a UAW worker's dues add to the over $1bil strike fundThat's one.
keep going
I know you have more cases upon which you'll expand in detail because an overall distaste for the very organizations that made life in this country tolerable because of only a handful of examples would be well........you know.
This. Competition for your job drives better performance. Better performance drives more efficiencies. More efficiencies drive cost savings. Cost savings allow for funds to be allocated in a manner which promotes those who do their jobs best. Those who do their jobs best are the most competitive. Do we see the circle here?Toyota, Honda, Nissa, BMW, MB, VW all are union free Stateside with the first two dominating the US market. 30% of a UAW worker's dues add to the over $1bil strike fund
life is just a bit different from when Unions first actually made a difference and when they first started appearing.
Because there are literally no other factors at work there. None at all.foreign auto makers seem to have no issue Stateside. they seem to be doing better than the big 3 who are union
Joker's comment pretty much summed up why those 6 auto companies are producing better products and doing better then the struggling Big 3Because there are literally no other factors at work there. None at all.
Atomic Tangerine or Cerulean?
Competition for your job drives better performance. Better performance drives more efficiencies. More efficiencies drive cost savings. Cost savings allow for funds to be allocated in a manner which promotes those who do their jobs best. Those who do their jobs best are the most competitive. Do we see the circle here?
If only that were the case, then it's a non-issue, right? But it sure doesn't happen in my industry.Cost savings allow for funds to be allocated in a manner which promotes those who do their jobs best.
I'm going to do something more fun than explain this to you, perhaps pounding rusty nails into the head of my cock with a spoon...Joker's comment pretty much summed up why those 6 auto companies are producing better products and doing better then the struggling Big 3
edit:
or sticking your head up your union bosses's ass?I'm going to do something more fun than explain this to you, perhaps pounding rusty nails into the head of my cock with a spoon...
Again, you ignorant slut, I've never been a union member. So you can dispense with that point of attack. You may as well make fun of me for being Russian or Brazilian.or sticking your head up your union bosses's ass?
oh lordy lord. someone disagrees with you
you are obviously pro union and i am obviously anti union. if you dont like my pov, then im done trying to prove my point
edit: of the 7 people i know in a union, 4 hate it and the other 3 love it since they are teachers...go figure
what "real world implication" is there? yes if you take out every single union at once would not be a good idea, but PLENTY of companies seem to be doing just fine without a union sucking them dry. unions use their collective bargaining bullsh1t as a way of strong arming people for what they want.It's not that I don't like your pov, it's that it's unbelievably lacking in any sort of nuance or real world implications.
I am guessing the teachers love it because they know they could stand to make less without a union and they make sh!t now as it is. If I were a teacher, I would feel the same way (teachers make sh!t, that's why I never pursued teaching).edit: of the 7 people i know in a union, 4 hate it and the other 3 love it since they are teachers...go figure
if they make sh!t now even with a union, why even pursue the career like you decided to do?I am guessing the teachers love it because they know they could stand to make less without a union and they make sh!t now as it is. If I were a teacher, I would feel the same way (teachers make sh!t, that's why I never pursued teaching).
Let's ignore the union debate for a minute. These are real people facing real harm. Let's do the math.
For a teacher making 50k a year -
1/2 of a 8.5% pension contribution = $2125
12% of health care for a family of 4 = easily $1000
So, the Governor is proposing to take away $3125 from each of these people and they are being unreasonable? They are also taking away their bargaining rights. I thought right wingers were for personal rights and against the redistribution thing.
The trade imbalance, Wall Street, health care companies, oil companies and defense contractors are literally sucking trillions of dollars out of our economy. Attacking workers is not the answer to our problems. At what point will the right wingers actually stand up for their neighbors?
and no chance of them getting head licesolution: People need to stop breeding. No kids = no need for teachers! duh....
I shaved my head in November because of lice......and no chance of them getting head lice
Are you sick of high paid teachers? Teachers hefty salaries are driving up taxes, and they only work 9 or 10 months a year! Its time we put things in perspective and pay them for what they do - baby sit! We can get that for less than minimum wage.
Thats right. Lets give them $3.00 an hour and only the hours they worked; not any of that silly planning time, or any time they spend before or after school. That would be $19.50 a day (7:45 to 3:00 PM
with 45 min. off for lunch and plan that equals 6 1/2 hours).
Each parent should pay $19.50 a day for these teachers to baby-sit their children.
Now how many do they teach in day maybe 30? So thats $19.50 x 30 = $585.00 a day. However, remember they only work 180 days a year!!! I am not going to pay them for any vacations.
LETS SEE . Thats $585 X 180= $105,300 peryear. (Hold on! My calculator needs new batteries).
What about those special education teachers and the ones with Masters degrees? Well, we could pay them minimum wage ($7.75), and just to be fair, round it off to $8.00 an hour. That would be $8 X 6 1/2 hours X 30 children
X 180 days = $280,800 per year.
Wait a minute theres something wrong here! There sure is!
The average teachers salary (nation wide) is $50,000. $50,000/180 days = $277.77/per day/30 students=$9.25/6.5 hours = $1.42 per hour per studenta very inexpensive baby-sitter and they even EDUCATE your
kids!)
WHAT A DEAL!!!!
I wish I only had to pay $19.50 a day for daycare. WTF?repost from somewhere else...
My wife made $14642 last year. Granted, she only teaches afternoon kindergarten so she is only paid to work half time, although that certianly isn't the case, especially @ report card time. If she was full time her salary would "double" to a whopping $29284, and this is my wifes 5th year there. Every single teacher my wife works with who does not have a significant other with a job is working another part time job to supplement income. This is at a school who consistently comes in #1 in its state wide test scores. It is absolutely reprehensible that at any school a teacher has to take on a second job or depend on another income just to make ends. Never mind how much the average teacher is paying out of pocket for supplies because the school districts are too broke to buy basic necessities.i thought it was common knowledge that grade school teachers got paid like sh*t?
my mom is a teacher as well, and has something like 30 years of experience. yet her salary is roughly half what i make, and i've been working just shy of 4 yearsMy wife made $14642 last year. Granted, she only teaches afternoon kindergarten so she is only paid to work half time, although that certianly isn't the case, especially @ report card time. If she was full time her salary would "double" to a whopping $29284, and this is my wifes 5th year there. Every single teacher my wife works with who does not have a significant other with a job is working another part time job to supplement income. This is at a school who consistently comes in #1 in its state wide test scores. It is absolutely reprehensible that at any school a teacher has to take on a second job or depend on another income just to make ends. Never mind how much the average teacher is paying out of pocket for supplies because the school districts are too broke to buy basic necessities.
I've said this before, and will say it again. Pay teachers a premium, and we will get higher quality teachers and better educated kids.My wife made $14642 last year. Granted, she only teaches afternoon kindergarten so she is only paid to work half time, although that certianly isn't the case, especially @ report card time. If she was full time her salary would "double" to a whopping $29284, and this is my wifes 5th year there. Every single teacher my wife works with who does not have a significant other with a job is working another part time job to supplement income. This is at a school who consistently comes in #1 in its state wide test scores. It is absolutely reprehensible that at any school a teacher has to take on a second job or depend on another income just to make ends. Never mind how much the average teacher is paying out of pocket for supplies because the school districts are too broke to buy basic necessities.
I approve of all of these ideas.stuff
Colorado. But I'll save ya the trouble.I think people are forgetting the other half of the equation:
how are you going to pay off the state's deficit?
Pension reform is necessary. While I don't think teachers are to blame, they should pay a little more for their benefits.
Unfortunately, this is also time for teacher reform, specifically tenure. It is not directly related to pay, but it is time to discuss it.
P.S. Pesqueeb, what state do you live in? I want to see what the median and entry salaries are for teachers. I can't believe it is $28k.
Wow, I agree with all of this. I didn't see that coming.I've said this before, and will say it again. Pay teachers a premium, and we will get higher quality teachers and better educated kids.
How do we pay for this you ask?
1. withdraw our armies from everywhere but here
2. $50 for a hammer? Go F* yourself mr military; we're halfing your budget
3. Social Security? Did we make commitments, we sure did. Let's make forward cuts for those not currently born/working, as they are not contributing members of society currently.
4. Interest. We bought it, now we pay for it. We have a great bunch of toys that we bought(again see military), like someone with an awesome boat and buttload of debt, you have to pay the piper too.
5. Raise taxes. Yep, raise them. See above for reasoning. Let's see how much stomach the masses have for a giant global military when they actually have to pay for it.
Because that has worked so awesome in other areas?I've said this before, and will say it again. Pay teachers a premium, and we will get higher quality teachers and better educated kids.
What did that guy do after Flatrock?Because that has worked so awesome in other areas?
Example:
When I was at Flatrock, we paid top dollar to bring on a CEO with IPO experience to get us a second round of funding and secure a plan to take the company public.
6 months later, I and everyone else took a 33% reduction in pay to extend the funding we had until our awesome CEO could secure round B. 3 months after our pay reduction, Flatrock was closed and everyone was out the door.
Later it was reveled that the CEO didn't take the pay cut that he asked the rest of the company to take. Better still, when Flatrock closed, he got a huge check for his services. His services? He didn't secure a second round and that was well short of what was expected.
I only wish. According to linkedin:What did that guy do after Flatrock?
Worked at a Starbucks because he failed as a CEO, right?
Can't pass it when the Democrats are present, so try to sneak in a vote when they're absent from the chamber...Assembly Republicans convened their floor session a few minutes before its scheduled start Friday evening and moved Gov. Scott Walker's controversial budget repair bill toward final passage before Democrats could enter the chamber, prompting howls of outrage from Assembly Democrats.
So, if they don't have to have a quorum to pass it, what makes it sneaky, other than convening early?Latest bit.
Can't pass it when the Democrats are present, so try to sneak in a vote when they're absent from the chamber...
Classy, GOP, real classy.
edit: This is the Assembly, where the GOP has a big enough lead that they don't have to worry about obtaining a Quorum. The vote in the Senate is still blocked.
That's the assembly, where the Republicans have enough to have a quorum. It's the senate Democrats who are blocking a vote. And last I checked blocking a vote is slightly different than holding a secret vote so that the other side doesn't know about it.So, if they don't have to have a quorum to pass it, what makes it sneaky, other than convening early?
Any less classy than running to IL to a waterpark resort, then running somewhere else when the media found out, meanwhile, back at the capital, the Sargent of arms is trying to hunt them down?
Face it, WI's government is making the Tea Party look smart.