Too bad that bike belongs to Danny HartLinkage driven Single pivots and floating brakes can still work well. Ask Pierron
View attachment 148076
Is it? As in it's coming on production bikes and everyone is using it?Linkage driven Single pivots and floating brakes can still work well. Ask Pierron
View attachment 148076
IMO, you need some kind of anti-dive fork to make it work right, since your rear won't be squatting, otherwise you end up with the bike trying to pitch you forward on the steep stuff.@Tantrum Cycles worked with Brake Therapy back in the golden days of floating brake mounts. IIRC he said what killed them was the added complexity and the perceived weight they added to the bike.
You never use your front brake, don't you?IMO, you need some kind of anti-dive fork to make it work right, since your rear won't be squatting, otherwise you end up with the bike trying to pitch you forward on the steep stuff.
IMO, you need some kind of anti-dive fork to make it work right, since your rear won't be squatting, otherwise you end up with the bike trying to pitch you forward on the steep stuff.
Yep, with a good ole soggy horst link too! At least it's called the "WTF".Structure Cycleworks
Structure Cycleworks: patented WTF front linkage suspension creates the world's most advanced mountain bikes. The SCW1 all carbon enduro bike is now at select dealers, resorts and online.structure.bike
I was there when Danny ripped the overall out of Pierrons grasp, hence ask Pierron if they can work?Too bad that bike belongs to Danny Hart
I was just busting you're ballsIs it? As in it's coming on production bikes and everyone is using it?
Or alive-and-well as in it's on a prototype that appears to have adjustment built in, possibly for testing purposes?
I mean, maybe it'll make a comeback with just the right amount of squat dialed in and not every design is able to just bolt the brake on the stay/triangle and get good results. So there are constraints to the rear system if you want to bolt the brake to the stays or you can have "total freedom" by going to a floating system. If mfr A decides to use some whacked out linkage arrangement that can't bolt the brake to the stays, then I have to wonder if that whacked out linkage arrangement is doing anything above and beyond what other manufacturers are.
So it's definitely not out of the real of possibilities that we could see it come back IMO, just that there hasn't been a significant need for it.
Gotcha, little early morning internets surfing on my part.I was there when Danny ripped the overall out of Pierrons grasp, hence ask Pierron if they can work?
The changes they've made are great, but deadset why the hell give the bike such a steep SA, but have the post move 30º backward for climbing height.... *eye twitch*I like the numbers on the new Konas. Wish they'd given the 153 the mullet option that the X gets.
Kona Announces New Process X & Aluminum 153 - Pinkbike
Kona's 2021 Process X offers a carbon frame and 162mm of travel while the 153 is now in aluminum.www.pinkbike.com
You read it here first, adjustable fore-aft seats, to mount to your dropper post, controlled by another cable, so you have a thumb and trigger on the left side.The changes they've made are great, but deadset why the hell give the bike such a steep SA, but have the post move 30º backward for climbing height.... *eye twitch*
Glad they lengthened the stays though. 425 was too squirrely when stuff gets rowdy.
Graphics look clean and minimal on the pic you posted. Now, the white on in the review on the other hand...Aside from the yet again terrible frame graphics, this doesn't look bad at all and comes in aluminum as well. Adjustable geometry is nice too:
https://flowmountainbike.com/tests/first-ride-review-2021-giant-trance-x-29-2/?fbclid=IwAR1tJhdy9yYxiPsBy3YcC8vNdbsXD0KVZ1U2hqY8-yyA8DcMyYJMoYno61g
Comfy is personal preference. Want to try steeper? Push your dear all the way forward in the rails.What's a comfy climbing STA on a hardtail? My dartmoor is at 73 (425 cs, 65 ha) I would like it to be steeper but I haven't tried other hardtails.
The dark ones look ok, the cheapest aluminum build looks the best imo. It's only on the brighter ones where you can see how unimaginative that design is.Graphics look clean and minimal on the pic you posted. Now, the white on in the review on the other hand...
Yeah, I agree with you. Let's remember though, we're talking Giant here. Expectations are low already. Less is more when it comes to mass market bike logos/colors. There's already logo overload w/ every component screaming for attention. If you'd ask most non-bike people what kind of bike the above is, they'd say: MAXXISThe dark ones look ok, the cheapest aluminum build looks the best imo. It's only on the brighter ones where you can see how unimaginative that design is.
speaking of which, the status is looking pretty solid. the industry needs more stuff like this.STA looks too slack on the Giant, but I remain a fan of budget-friendly bikes with OK spec, available to the masses!
Damn, that is nice looking. Whats budget about it exactly?speaking of which, the status is looking pretty solid. the industry needs more stuff like this.
https://www.bikeradar.com/reviews/bikes/mountain-bikes/full-suspension-mountain-bikes/2021-specialized-status-160-review/
2600 Trump pesos. Pretty decent spec for the price. Looks like YT and the other European direct sale brands were hitting Mr Sinyard's revenue pretty hard.Damn, that is nice looking. Whats budget about it exactly?
Kind of reminds me of the Pitch from years back. "Budget" and simple, but it was a great bike.
Would ride any of those before giving money to special ed. Don’t care what it costs.2600 Trump pesos. Pretty decent spec for the price. Looks like YT and the other European direct sale brands were hitting Mr Sinyard's revenue pretty hard.
I want to see a few more companies bringing out Mullet designs. It's ridiculous how many pros are running their bikes "mulleted" using either custom rear ends or linkages. Hoping us mortals can get a bike that is designed that way - doing it yourself fucks up too many things.speaking of which, the status is looking pretty solid. the industry needs more stuff like this.
https://www.bikeradar.com/reviews/bikes/mountain-bikes/full-suspension-mountain-bikes/2021-specialized-status-160-review/
Jesus, that is a brutally steep STA on a hardtail, especially with the sag you'd get from a 150mm fork.Kona finally got the numbers right with the new Honzo ESD. On my short list of wanted steel hardtail.
https://www.bikemag.com/gear/mountain-bikes/tested-kona-honzo-esd-2700/
View attachment 148388
I welcome the opportunity to run a hardtail singlespeed. And you are correct for the SA, this would need to be demoed before commiting.Jesus, that is a brutally steep STA on a hardtail, especially with the sag you'd get from a 150mm fork.
Mine is 76 with a 130mm fork and I took my T-Mac pedals off and went back to a parallelogram shape just to get my foot a bit further forward. If you can tolerate the forward position or have small feet it would be beneficial as you don't have to compromise as much with your fork setup.
Also, do you really want an adjustable back end? It's fine if you do, annoying if you don't, I just get the scraper out and take all the paint off the sliding/clamping bits or they tend to start moving and loosening under load.
Yeah fair enough, I'd rather run something like a Blackspire Stinger as a tensioner or one of these with normal dropouts-I welcome the opportunity to run a hardtail singlespeed. And you are correct for the SA, this would need to be demoed before commiting.
MED/400mm | LRG/430mm | XL/460mm | ||
A | Head Angle (degrees) | 62.0 | 62.0 | 62.0 |
B | Head Tube (mm) | 110 | 120 | 140 |
C | Top Tube Effective(mm) | 595 | 625 | 670 |
D | Seat Tube Angle (degrees) | 77.0 | 77.0 | 77.0 |
E | Seat Tube C-T Actual (mm) | 400 | 430 | 460 |
F | Chainstays (mm) | 458 | 458 | 458 |
G | BB Drop (mm) | 50 | 50 | 50 |
I | Stack (mm) | 625 | 640 | 650 |
J | Reach (mm) | 450 | 480 | 520 |
O | Wheelbase (mm) | 1261 | 1296 | 1345 |
P | front Centre (mm) | 808 | 842 | 892 |
Have you looked at the RSD Middle Child?Yeah fair enough, I'd rather run something like a Blackspire Stinger as a tensioner or one of these with normal dropouts-
View attachment 148428
The Hello Dave is another hardtail in the formerly unrideable category, crazy long back end would reduce the feedback at the pedals a fair bit, reach is a touch shorter at 480.
View attachment 148430
The Norco Torrent is more suited to me but it is basically a 29er version of my current bike.
My 76/74 SA/HA Chromag seems to hit the sweet spot for me. But if I was riding it on Single Speed viable trails I think I would steer towards more traditional geometry. Especially the seat angle. I find steeper seat angles to be fucking annoying when standing without the seat dropped.I welcome the opportunity to run a hardtail singlespeed. And you are correct for the SA, this would need to be demoed before commiting.