Isn't not consenting to a search probable cause with most cops?form what you are saying , it sure appears the police didn't have probable cause.
Dude, why do you need to drive around with a scale?
Isn't not consenting to a search probable cause with most cops?form what you are saying , it sure appears the police didn't have probable cause.
He a hustla! Das wut day do!Isn't not consenting to a search probable cause with most cops?
Dude, why do you need to drive around with a scale?
Good words. Just gotta be smart with the stuff these days...though I still have letdowns in judgement occasionally. Altoids & Clear Eyes can be good friends.If you own property, be it a vehicle or a house, you MUST keep illicit substances out of them at all times(if possible) due to our draconian seizure laws. <snip> It affects you more pleasantly when you don't toke constantly, it's less damaging to your health and it keeps you from becoming a jonesing, amotivational fiend that sits on your couch alone burnt out while life passes you by. In safety and in moderation, it can be a very positive thing but it's just not prudent in many jurisdictions to gamble your future over if you have a reckless, immature or addictive personality.
Mmmmm, group session....all fun & no paranoia involved.llkoolkeg said:Instead of buying big sacks and driving around with them like Snoop or storing them at home, why not save the herb for special occasions or evenings when you and your friends can all pitch in and burn it up safely and privately in one sitting?
Congratulations on yet another thoughtful injection of red herring to the discussion. If I was interested in changing my view settings, I would have already done so. THE POINT IS it's a surprisingly long thread and I wasn't interested in counting total numbers of responses.i cant believe you have over 3600+ posts and still havent figured out you can have all this thread in only 4 pages.
"Yo officer, I'm down wit da Weight Watchers"He a hustla! Das wut day do!
I was hoping you were past the "sniffin' glue" stage by now JBP.I have a triple beam that I use mostly for weighing epoxy and polyester resin...
Yeah, that stuff'll age you like crank. :biggrin: Ever seen the before/after pics of huffers who have been abusing for as short a time as a year? Frightening stuff.I was hoping you were past the "sniffin' glue" stage by now JBP.
Yeah, that stuff'll age you like crank. :biggrin: Ever seen the before/after pics of huffers who have been abusing for as short a time as a year? Frightening stuff.
I'd like to see links if ya have 'em. I do work on a drug related magazine aimed at teachers and could use the resource.Ever seen the before/after pics of huffers who have been abusing for as short a time as a year? Frightening stuff.
I think that lady lives down the street from me. weirdI'd like to see links if ya have 'em. I do work on a drug related magazine aimed at teachers and could use the resource.
I used this as part of a meth article:
wow you never saw the threads about me getting arrested or nearly dying in car crashes huh?Wow, you guys suck. There are certain situations where it's not cool to pile on or mock someones misfortune, regardless of the popularity (or lack thereof) of the the person in question. Props to the few who can give out good advice.
There is a fundamental difference in our concepts of law my man. The cop concept is "the legislature passed a bill banning some act and the governor ratified it so I will arrest people who do it." Lets call this the "authoritarian" view of law. This rests on the idea that a "crime" is something banned by the legislators.perfectly said.
"man...that cop pulled me over and searched my car just because i have nappy beez-wax filled dreads, grateful dead stickers and a PHISH license plate. friggin profilin' prick!"
....nevermind the clambake that was going on inside the car and the fact that potheads never seem to notice that they smell like a 150lb marijuana plant. some of you guys just make it too easy.
yup, we're just here to make your life a living hell for having illegal substances, the man is out to get you and you're the victim.
I knew it! :biggrin:You see, we're really just out to harrass people. we have no idea what we're doing and absolutely no knowledge of your 4th and 14th ammendment rights against illegal searches and siezures. we spend countless hours in legal training for nothing. yup, we're just here to make your life a living hell for having illegal substances, the man is out to get you and you're the victim. Plus we like to drive really fast with our sirens on for no reason and I am addicted to donuts
And yet, when you're in jail for a "victimless" crime....you're still in jail...There is a fundamental blah blah blah blah blah di blah blah...
brush up on your history "my man". a big debate in the early 18th century when our country was being formed was natural law vs. moral law....guess which side won out in the end? The native americans were viewed has having the primitive "natural law" which allowed them to do as they pleased without any formal moral code. the powers that be specifically codified "moral law" in the formative years of the legislative branch for a reason.In contrast, the "natural law" view (by the way, thats the one our country's founders espoused) .......
.......a political system that has deviated its natural law roots that they support the authoritarian view.
You put people in jail for victimless crimes. You have to do it by becoming a cop. Does that make you an evil person? No, I sure you have your good qualities, but it's certainly a big goddamn black mark in my book.
Bwahhahaha!You put people in jail for victimless crimes. You have to do it by becoming a cop. Does that make you an evil person? No, I sure you have your good qualities, but it's certainly a big goddamn black mark in my book.
In what world is drug production and distribution victimless? Certainly not this one. Think before you type.There is a fundamental difference in our concepts of law my man. The cop concept is "the legislature passed a bill banning some act and the governor ratified it so I will arrest people who do it." Lets call this the "authoritarian" view of law. This rests on the idea that a "crime" is something banned by the legislators.
In contrast, the "natural law" view (by the way, thats the one our country's founders espoused) rests on the notion that human legal codes are simply imperfect written approximations of a more fundamental and reason-based system of rights and duties that applies to all human beings in all jurisdictions. This code is based on the idea of a "crime" as a willfully malicious act with an identifiable victim. To constitute a crime, none of those parts are optional. You must first intend to do harm and then do it to an actual person.
The reason that many people hate cops is that they signal by the very act of becoming officers of a political system that has deviated its natural law roots that they support the authoritarian view.
You put people in jail for victimless crimes. You have to do it by becoming a cop. Does that make you an evil person? No, I sure you have your good qualities, but it's certainly a big goddamn black mark in my book.
What about when you grow in your closet, and smoke in your basement?In what world is drug production and distribution victimless? Certainly not this one. Think before you type.
Smoking=lung cancer, emphysema, throat cancer, etc etc. That costs money, which is paid by insurance companies, which causes our premiums to rise.What about when you grow in your closet, and smoke in your basement?
I'm not set on either side of this issue, but it is going to take some work to convince people that the aformentioned situation harms anyone.
What about when you grow in your closet, and smoke in your basement?
I'm not set on either side of this issue, but it is going to take some work to convince people that the aformentioned situation harms anyone.
The reason that many people hate cops is that they signal by the very act of becoming officers of a political system that has deviated its natural law roots that they support the authoritarian view.
The one where drug possession is legal. I haven't seen the Miller people bomb the Budweiser brewery lately...the Molson delivery man doesn't carry a gun...you get the idea.In what world is drug production and distribution victimless? Certainly not this one. Think before you type.
Sure is. And I'm a hypocrit. I hate tobacco but I'll never hate wine or beer. Or burbon for that matter.Is alcohol a drug by definition?...D
quit the gloom and doom nobody wants to hear it (^ @! # !! @% !% @!) decipher whats in the parentheseis, PM me with the answer and i'll give u a prize. It's perfectly relative to the sentence.
So tax dollars should be responsible for taking care of the Coke, crack and heroin ODs?The one where drug possession is legal. I haven't seen the Miller people bomb the Budweiser brewery lately...the Molson delivery man doesn't carry a gun...you get the idea.
He didn't keep going on about the "illegal search," other people responding to the thread did.Instead of going on about "illegal search" he could have simply asked "what should I expect to get from a judge?"
You could pretty easily make the case that it not only is a drug, but is far more damaging to society than most illegal drugs. The number of deaths caused directly make it the third leading cause of death according to a study published in the journal of the American medical association.Is alcohol a drug by definition?...D
thats what I thought, but halloween night, I was aked to step out and put my hands on top of the car and then was searched/patted down!Bingo. They can find probable cause to search the car really easy if you are a douche. The chance of them searching you is pretty low if you are a decent guy.
the fine legal system at workmy friend just got out of 2 dwi's and he's 18, so a lawyer will save your ass
oh yes you know it:biggrin:the fine legal system at work
Yes, it should. It would be a hell of a lot cheaper than the current apparatus in place that you pay for to prohibit it.So tax dollars should be responsible for taking care of the Coke, crack and heroin ODs?
Making crack, heroin etc legal means a crack head isn't going to steal to get his next hit?
I'm sure you see my point. it is NEVER a victimless crime.
As far as the search goes, it probably was legal. According to the supreme court it depends on if the police had any indications that drug were involved. If they had a tip, claim he was acting drugged, or had a legitimate concern for their safety(i.e. thought a deadly weapon was involved) the search is legal. The devil is always in the details. And given that he's facing a small fine, making a constitutional case out of it isn't worth it, even if he is right. The bottom line is that he's guilty and knows it.He didn't keep going on about the "illegal search," other people responding to the thread did.