Same thing as last year. It helps that the other 3 teams in their division are horrible. It should be another easy year for them to lose the Superbowl.
NFL offseason 2008 discussion
- Thread starter LordOpie
- Start date
Same thing as last year. It helps that the other 3 teams in their division are horrible. It should be another easy year for them to lose the Superbowl.
I'm thinking Buffalo makes a run for a wild card spot, probably beats NE in Buffalo.
Which team should move to LA? (I heard they're building a stadium and are pushing to get a team)
Should the NFL expand by two teams?
ESPN radio is talking about it now and has a poll with Radiers, Bills, Jags, Saints, and Vikes.
I say raiders. A caller suggested the 49ers.
If the NFL added two teams, who'd get the other one? A Canadian team?
Should the NFL expand by two teams?
ESPN radio is talking about it now and has a poll with Radiers, Bills, Jags, Saints, and Vikes.
I say raiders. A caller suggested the 49ers.
If the NFL added two teams, who'd get the other one? A Canadian team?
Expansion would dilute the talent pool further and ruin any concept of parity. It could really ruin a good thing.
yeah, so which team should move?
Also, why does LA want a team so bad when they couldn't keep the last one they had?
I'm not sure its LA that wants the team so bad as it is the NFL wanting a team in the second (maybe first) largest TV market in the country.
Leave the Chargers where they are and just call them the LA Chargers.
The LA Chargers of Anaheim/Greater San Diego Southern Cal.
What about all the XFL players that are now pumping gas? If the NFL created 2 new teams, they could pretend to play again.
Does Canadian teams still have to piss test for 'roids? If so, the XFL guys are sh!t out of luck, then.
The SoCal Chargers. Change the logo to a credit card and build a stadium in a strip mall.
Like this?
MN traded 3 draft picks to KC for their outstanding DE, Jared Allen. If Allen can stay out of off-field trouble, this really puts them in a position to make the playoffs.
In other 'trade' news, WA offered two first round picks to Cincy for Chad... Cincy turned it down. WTF are they thinking?!
In other 'trade' news, WA offered two first round picks to Cincy for Chad... Cincy turned it down. WTF are they thinking?!
They are thinking they don't want to pay the $8.5M cap penalty for trading him...
It's paid regardless. The issue is, if they wait until after June 1st, they can divide it up over two years instead of taking the whole hit this year.
They should just redo his deal and keep him, figure out how to make him happy he is too good to let go... On paper the Bengals should be good...
The Bungles are stupid. No wonder they suck.
Bangles Mgt argument is that they want to discourage other players from trying this garbage in the future. I understand that, but trading him has less of a impact in this regard then outright giving in.
i wonder where alexander is headed? I hope chicago but doubt it will happen
I hope Denver!
If his hand and foot are too damaged to play, so be it, but what if...?!
Your Bears need to draft a RB -- DMac, Mendenhall, someone -- instead of taking a chance on probable damaged goods.
As reported on ESPN radio just now, the NFL has officially said that the Rams cannot do what the Dolphins just did with Long, but they will review this for next year's draft.
Which means that they could come to terms with a player, draft him, and then that player holds out for more.
Which means that they could come to terms with a player, draft him, and then that player holds out for more.
ESPN is reporting that Tennessee has agreed to trade Pacman Jones to Dallas for a 4th round pick in this week's draft, and could include another pick if Jones reaches certain milestones. If he does not get reinstated, the Titans will send a pick back to Dallas in the 09 draft.
DMac won't make it past the Jets. But, the Bears should get either Mendenhall or Felix Jones.I hope Denver!
If his hand and foot are too damaged to play, so be it, but what if...?!
Your Bears need to draft a RB -- DMac, Mendenhall, someone -- instead of taking a chance on probable damaged goods.
bears won't take an RB in the first.
welcome back.
Bears need LB since they're going to lose both Briggs and Urlacher.
I'm not surprised that Oakland took the 'best' player in the draft, who'll likely make an immediate impact and help the team for years, but they should've drafted based on need.
With DMac, they have a crowded RB position. I guess they'll trade one or more of them?
With DMac, they have a crowded RB position. I guess they'll trade one or more of them?
I'll take Stewart and Otah.
If Stewart is the player they say, they should make for a great tandem.
Next year's first and this years second was a bit steep but f' it next year is next year. Otah is a big beast of a tackle.
Steelers gonna get Sweede
No, But we now have four running backs for some reason...................
Connor to Carolina was a good pick. He's a very heady player and fun to watch. Always near the ball, rarely out of position covering sideline to sideline very well. Have enjoyed watching him play the last few years.
He probably was the best available player but now we have a ton of linebackers and I'm not sure where he fits in except as a back up to John Beason in the middle. But if he is as good as they say maybe he'll compete. I would have rather them taken a DT which is where we are thin right now.
Godfrey was a smarter pick because eventhough he played CB at Iowa he projects into the NFL as a free safety which we actually needed.
I think he'll find plenty of playing time. Connor played outside when Posluszny was in the middle so he could always go back.