I got nothin', man. Other than:So I’m not super pleased with my powder skis, 190 cm Moment Bibby if you haven’t been following along. 118 mm underfoot. This review is of one generation older, but the shape seems similar but not the exact dimensions:
https://blisterreview.com/gear-reviews/2013-2014-moment-bibby-pro
I guess I should be more specific: The Bibbys are fantastic in deep powder. They float well, I can muscle them around, they’re fun.
The problem is that even on a 19”-over-24 hours day like yesterday the time I’m actually in deep powder is maybe 10% of my day, and for the rest of the day I’d rather be on something more like my Mantras.
I don’t feel comfortable at speed on the Bibbys, I have to work hard to get them to carve a turn instead of smearing, and they don’t feel settled in a straight line in general. I really was being left behind on all the transition sections by Shared Skittles yesterday because I wasn’t comfortable going faster than I was.
Thoughts? @Nick @SkaredShtles @Full Trucker ? I guess I could keep them around for future cat/heli skiing shenanigans, but otherwise I am leaning towards SS’s “one 106ish mm ski to rule them all” philosophy for the conditions we actually get here.
The Polestar's EV's and roadster hybrid that are upcoming look pretty snazzy. You could see if your Volvo sales guy will do you a dealFCA introduces Compass and Renegade PHEVs.
https://www.allpar.com/news/2019/03/jeep-compass-renegade-plug-in-hybrids-reveal-eawd-43999
While these particular platforms are not of interest to me their powertrains are.
They seem to have a gas engine and standard transmission hooked to the front axle, and an independent electric setup for the rear axle, battery in transmission tunnel. No propshaft or other connection between axles.
So in its 31 mile EV range it’s a RWD vehicle. AWD via software coordination.
An interesting approach, and one that might see life in a PacHy in the future, albeit maybe with the front still via the 2 motor Toyota/TRW design.
Interesting. Good thing I likely won’t have this one long enough for it to be an issue! As long as it can last one winter…
A cordless drill and a 1/2" bit would solve the problem without buying a whole new car, you know.Interesting. Good thing I likely won’t have this one long enough for it to be an issue! As long as it can last one winter…
Congratulations to BMW for building an electric car that I might have been interested in 6 years ago.As well as its working range of 120 miles, the i3S has a top speed of 100 mph and will accelerate from 0-62 mph in 7.7 seconds. With over 360 pounds more to pull about, the 2,998-pound Mini EV will be slower, with less range, especially if used in cold conditions.
Maybe it'll be $8000 brand new?*le sad*
Congratulations to BMW for building an electric car that I might have been interested in 6 years ago.
The figure I keep seeing is "around £29k", or 38k USD. I really want to like this car but jesus, is BMW making it hard.Maybe it'll be $8000 brand new?
My take is that this compares favorably to the plans for Electrify America. They plan 150 kW CCS stations on highways with a future upgrade path to 350 kW. Instead Tesla already has 120 kW Superchargers all over the place and will roll out 250 kW ones going forward. Bird in hand, etc.On Tesla’s most efficient vehicles, like the Long Range Model 3, the company says that the new Supercharger V3 can add up to 75 miles of range in 5 minutes and charge at a peak rage of 1,000 miles per hour of range.
Others share my skepticism. I think he’s going to deliver stop line, red light, and rudimentary intersection handling ability at the end of this year with the same level 2 caveat that it might crap out and require intervention immediately at any time and claim Mission Accomplished.In January 2016, Musk predicted that Tesla cars would be able to drive autonomously coast to coast "in ~2 years.
Needless to say, this hasn't happened. And after more than two years of peddling unrealistic visions of Autopilot's future, Tesla's Autopilot page has finally been updated to reflect that reality.
The page's headline has changed from "Full Self-Driving Hardware on All Cars" to "Future of Driving." A sentence about Tesla's ride-sharing network has been deleted. The "Full Self-Driving" section now includes a disclaimer that "future use of these features without supervision is dependent on achieving reliability far in excess of human drivers as demonstrated by billions of miles of experience."
In other words, despite Musk's bluster over the years, Autopilot is still just a driver-assistance system. And it will continue to be just a driver-assistance system for some time to come.
My wife is the voice of reason and reminded me just now that an LX would have the same drawbacks as the Land Cruiser had:Verdict: the 2016+ LX is what I wanted my Land Cruiser to be, for better or worse. But is that what I want? I do want something bigger than my 3 ultimately and it would make for a great ski day vehicle as did my Land Cruiser. Saner 3 row AWD alternatives abound but are just so… normal.
The 3 row SUV market is depressing. The X doesn’t speak to me, yes, but the Ascent and its ilk really don’t. Their 3rd rows are also way less useful than those of a minivan, even if they are better than that of the Land Cruiser. Access is also worse, mildly tempered by fancy tilt-with-car-seat tricks.Or maybe we will try our luck next season as a family on ski trips with Nokians (and auto socks) on the FWD PacHy. Or maybe I’ll go conventional once more.
I totally did daydream a minute when I saw that new option. Even has adaptive cruise!AWD Ford Transit, problem solved.
Eh, there's not much to it. Quigley will convert an NV3500 for ya, and you can buy ready-made Sprinter and Transit 4x4s now, too. Practically they would suck for the factors I mentioned re the Transit a few posts up, but if you're in Utah and feel compelled to pop out 6 crotchfruit then they're the ticket for winter activities.
that looks nice and all . . . i (and I think the fam in general) really miss our r350. that thing was awesome. i wish instead of canning it they'd updated it. oh well . . .Concept EQV unveiled:
https://insideevs.com/mercedes-benz-eqv-long-range-concept-mpv/ among other coverage. 100 kWh pack (!) yielding 249 miles of range. 201 hp, FWD. Unspecified quick charging capability is present, presumably CCS ~150 kW or so given the time quoted.
I, or rather my wife, could definitely dig it as a non-Model X replacement for the PacHy.
I've always heard them referred to as "mormon assault vehicle".Mormon sportscar
DeLorean?Tesla management need to get their heads screwed on tighter:
https://www.cnn.com/2019/03/11/tech/tesla-price-rises/index.html
Context is of announcing the $35k Model 3 and closing almost all stores, then backing that out, then raising prices as a response. All within a week or a week and a half. Oh and a 7% workplace cull last month. Not confidence inspiring.
Is Elon Musk a drug smuggler? Perhaps, perhapsDeLorean?
will get busted for smuggling memes into the EUIs Elon Musk a drug smuggler? Perhaps, perhaps
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/john-z-delorean-is-arrested-in-24-million-cocaine-deal
Although this could well backfire on me if they drop prices again later in the year in yet another capricious move, this invites the question of whether I should move quicker than planned on my 3 LR AWD -> 3 Performance idea.As a result of keeping significantly more stores open, Tesla will need to raise vehicle prices by about 3% on average worldwide. In other words, we will only close about half as many stores, but the cost savings are therefore only about half.
Potential Tesla owners will have a week to place their order before prices rise, so current prices are valid until March 18th. There will be no price increase to the $35,000 Model 3. The price increases will only apply to the more expensive variants of Model 3, as well as Model S and X.
A potential plan given the actual announcement: https://www.tesla.com/blog/update-tesla-stores-and-pricing?utm_cam
Although this could well backfire on me if they drop prices again later in the year in yet another capricious move, this invites the question of whether I should move quicker than planned on my 3 LR AWD -> 3 Performance idea.
Relevant factoids:
- DCU is still offering 3.99%, which is equal to my current rate
- I apparently can get a Tesla trade-in appraisal online at any time and have time later this week to get CarMax's appraisal, too
- if any available could potentially angle for an ex-demo vehicle for an additional discount
- don't have enough going on in my life at the moment, apparently
- I can work around summer tires given the limited skiing I still have planned for the season
Step 1 should be to get that online Tesla appraisal rolling and scheduling a time at CarMax. If both of those super low then this can all be aborted.
Just wait, at the end of the quarter they announce that demand has cratered and they're dropping prices $5k across the board. And firing everyone. Or maybe not.